Laserfiche WebLink
<br />One of the issues raised in testimony to City Council pertained to the limitation to two categories <br />of animals for development sites comprising less than 20,000 square feet. Staff originally <br />proposed that there would be no limitation on the animal categories, just the number of animals <br />allowed in each category. However, the Planning Commission recommended that it be limited to <br />only two categories of animals. <br /> <br />Additionally, the proposed limitation on the number of chickens, rabbits, and domestic fowl under <br />six months of age was raised in testimony. While staff proposed no change to the current code <br />(which does not limit the number of animals under six months of age), the Planning Commission <br />recommended that it be limited to a maximum of six chickens, rabbits, and domestic fowl under <br />six months of age. <br /> <br />Testimony was also received regarding a desire to have an increase in the number of goats, <br />rabbits, and bee hives allowed in each animal category for development sites less than 20,000 <br />square feet. <br /> <br />Following the public hearing, Councilor Poling requested additional information on sanitation and <br />licensing. As part of this code amendment process, staff considered whether additional <br />requirements were needed to address any potential impacts to the stormwater system or open <br />water ways. It was determined that the existing waterside protection and water quality overlay <br />zones prohibit animal waste in or near the protected waterways, riparian areas, and adjacent <br />wetlands. Similarly, dumping wastewater into the stormwater system is prohibited and regulated <br />by the current Eugene Code in 6.446. <br /> <br />The animal keeping codes from other cities varied whether or not they had a licensing program. <br />Historically the need to enforce the farm animal standards has been low. Over the last two years <br />an average of 24 complaints were received, mostly relating to roosters. Although the new <br />standards increase the allowable amount of animals, the proposed standards clarify current code <br />and strengthen compatibility standards. At this time, staff does not anticipate the need for a <br />licensing program, but recommend re-evaluating this based on community feedback. <br /> <br />The attached draft ordinance (Attachment B) represents the Planning Commission’s <br />recommendation. Further details regarding the Planning Commission’s discussion, along with a <br />complete set of record materials, are available for review in a binder located at the City Council <br />Office and on line at www.eugene-or.gov/farmanimals. <br /> <br />Findings in support of the amendments are included as Exhibit A to the ordinance. The ordinance <br />and findings, with any directed changes, will be utilized in the event that the City Council votes to <br />approve the proposal upon finding that it complies with the applicable approval criteria. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Findings addressing consistency with related City policies, including provisions of the Metro Plan <br />and applicable refinement plans, are included as an Exhibit A to the draft ordinance. As noted <br />above, these are also consistent with the City of Eugene Food Security Scoping and Resource Plan <br />and support a strategy in Envision Eugene under the Climate Change and Energy Resiliency pillar <br /> S:\CMO\2013 Council Agendas\M130211\S1302115.doc <br /> <br />