Laserfiche WebLink
<br />When IPM is implemented, cultural practices are modified to reduce pest populations and least <br />toxic non-chemical control methods are tried before pesticides are applied. If a pest cannot be <br />controlled without the use of pesticides, the IPM strategy dictates use of the least toxic effective <br />pesticide that will have the least non-target impacts. For example, staff might try hand-pulling and <br />sheet mulching invasive weeds at Hendricks Park before using a pesticide. If non-chemical <br />methods are not successful in controlling the invasives, staff might reconsider whether control of <br />the plant is critical to the function of the plant community. If it is critical, staff will choose the least <br />toxic herbicide that is known to be effective against the weed in question. <br /> <br />City staff has used an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy to manage parklands since the <br />early 1980s, and have been leaders in the IPM field for 30 years. City staff has been invited to <br />make presentations about its pest control methods at several regional conferences in the past few <br />years. The current edition of the POS IPM Policy and Operations Manual (IPM POM) was published <br />in 2007 and has been updated several times since then. The IPM POM document runs to nearly <br />100 pages and contains guidelines for the management of pests in many types of developed <br />landscapes, vacant lands, natural habitats, rights-of-way and medians, the golf course and rose <br />garden, as well as bioswales and waterways. The manual contains information on cultural <br />practices to prevent or limit the impacts of each pest and describes the effective control methods <br />for the pest, including non-chemical methods, and where applicable, the pesticides which are <br />known to be effective against the pest. <br /> <br />The POS IPM policy also outlines two programs which further limit the use of pesticides on <br />parklands: the Pesticide-Free Parks Program and the No Pesticide Zone policy. In partnership with <br />the Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides (NCAP) the City launched the Pesticide-Free <br />Parks program in 2007. Staff chose parks which could be reasonably maintained without the use <br />of pesticides, obtained the support of the neighborhood association for each park and launched <br />the program. Additional parks have been added to the program and the City currently has eight <br />pesticide-free parks, sites which are managed entirely without the use of pesticides, often with the <br />assistance of neighborhood groups or other volunteers. Additional parks are added to the <br />program when volunteer groups adopt them, committing to help with weed control on the site. <br /> <br />The No Pesticide Zone policy establishes no-pesticide zones around certain park features, <br />including: playgrounds, picnic areas, dog parks, swimming and wading pools, spray-play areas and <br />stormwater catch basins and inlets. These areas are managed without pesticides and weeds are <br />pulled by hand, burned or controlled with other non-chemical means. When it is necessary to <br />apply a pesticide in a No Pesticide Zone, for example when a nest of stinging insects is very near a <br />playground, the area is fenced or taped off and posted to alert park users. Depending on the <br />circumstances, hard surfaces near where the application was made may be washed down after the <br />application. <br /> <br />The Facility Management Division officially incorporates an IPM requirement into its Landscape <br />Maintenance contracts referencing the POS IPM manual. <br /> <br />The landscapes of several City facilities (Facility Management Campus, Lincoln Yards, Police <br />Services Building, The Train Depot, Washington Park Community Center, River House, Police <br />Headquarters Building, and the Kaufman House) are maintained through the use of hand pulling <br /> S:\CMO\2013 Council Agendas\M130313\S130313A.doc <br /> <br />