Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room—City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br />July 27, 2011 <br />Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Betty Taylor, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, Mike Clark, <br />Chris Pryor, Alan Zelenka, Pat Farr. <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the July 27, 2011, work session of the Eugene City Council to <br />order. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: <br /> Envision Eugene—Single-Family Housing and Industrial Lands <br /> <br />The council was joined by Technical Resource Group (TRG) members Shawn Boles, Rick Duncan, Mia <br />Nelson, and Sue Prichard. Planning Director Lisa Gardner, Metropolitan/Community Planning Manager <br />Carolyn Weiss, City Attorney Emily Jerome, and Planner Jason Dedrick were also present for the item. <br /> <br />Mr. Dedrick led the council through a PowerPoint presentation entitled Envision Eugene: Project Update <br />for Eugene City Council, July 27, 2011. Councilors asked questions clarifying the information presented. <br /> <br />The presentation highlighted the findings of the TRG’s Partially Vacant Lands Subcommittee and the <br />impact of the findings on the housing supply and land inventory. Mr. Dedrick indicated that 1,800 to <br />2,500 additional housing units could be located on existing lots that were larger than one acre in size; <br />when combined with the capacity that existed on lots less than one acre there were between 2,400 and <br />3,100 housing units that could be accommodated on partially vacant land inside the urban growth <br />boundary (UGB) over the next 20 years. Efficiency strategies (alley access and secondary units) could <br />yield an additional 160 housing units and redesignation of medium-density residentially zoned land to <br />low-density could potentially create an additional 1,200 additional housing units. Mr. Dedrick said that in <br />total, the findings suggested that there was capacity inside the UGB for 6,860 to 7,650 housing units. <br /> <br />Mr. Dedrick compared the land need for single-family housing using different mixes of single- <br />family/multi-family. A 60:40 mix would require land for 1,400 to 2,100 dwelling units; that fell to 650- <br />1,350 dwelling units under a 55:45 mix; to 0-600 dwelling units under a 50:50 mix; and to 0 dwelling <br />units under a 40:60 mix. He then shared information about the land demand for uses typically located on <br />low-density residential land, such as schools, parks, and public facilities, which indicated a need for 210 <br />acres inside the UGB and 260 acres outside the UGB. <br /> <br />Mr. Dedrick estimated the single-family housing land need under the different mixes, indicating that a <br />60:40 mix required 560-735 acres; a 55:45 mix required 370-55 acres; a 50:50 mix required 210-360 <br />acres; and a 40:60 mix required no additional acreage. He said the range in acreage was based on the fact <br />that it would be necessary to consider the characteristics of the land added to the UGB. <br /> <br />Mr. Dedrick briefly reviewed the remaining steps in the TRG process. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 27, 2011 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />