Laserfiche WebLink
Following the public hearing, Councilor Alan Zelenka asked for staff to provide an explanation of <br />the problem each amendment is attempting to solve, and the rationale for the solution. Staff will <br />provide this information prior to council action. <br /> <br />As noted in the previous meeting materials, prior to the City Council’s public hearing, the Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of seven of the eight proposed amendments. The Planning <br />Commission vote was split on the proposal to allow housing on the ground floor of buildings in the <br />C-2 commercial zone. This proposal would allow the ground floor of a building in the C-2 <br />Community Commercial zone to be entirely housing, whereas currently a certain percentage of the <br />ground floor must be in commercial use. Providing housing on the ground floor in the commercial <br />zones is already allowed downtown. <br /> <br />Those Planning Commissioners voting in favor of the proposal expressed support for horizontal <br />mixed use and increased housing opportunities in downtown, on key transit corridors, and in core <br />commercial areas. They also cited the fact that the multi-family development standards would <br />apply to these projects, thereby providing more protection than currently required for buildings <br />with ground floor in commercial use with housing above. Those voting in opposition of the <br />proposal expressed concern about the potential for increasing density in the C-2 zone without <br />providing accompanying measures to address the transitions between higher density residential <br />uses and adjacent lower density residential uses. <br /> <br />The attached draft ordinance (see Attachment B) includes the proposal that would allow the <br />ground floor of a building in the C-2 Community Commercial zone to be entirely housing. Staff <br />supports this amendment based on the following: <br /> <br /> <br />Through Envision Eugene, specially the Community Resource Group, the understanding of <br /> <br />the term “mixed use” was broadened to include both vertical (housing over commercial) <br />and horizontal (housing adjacent to commercial). This amendment supports for and allows <br />for both concepts. <br /> <br />During the Envision Eugene public process, this proposal was suggested numerous times <br /> <br />by the public as a way to provide flexibility in commercial zones and increased housing <br />opportunities in downtown, on key transit corridors, and in core commercial areas. <br /> <br />An all-residential building in the C-2 zone would be subject to the multi-family <br /> <br />development standards, thereby providing more protections than currently required for <br />buildings with the ground floor in commercial use with housing above. <br /> <br />Regarding transitions between higher and lower density residential uses, buildings in the <br /> <br />C-2 zone that are within 50 feet of a residential zone are limited in height to the maximum <br />height allowed in that residential zone. <br /> <br />During this amendment process, support for this amendment was expressed by local <br /> <br />affordable housing providers as a benefit to affordable housing projects proposed in <br />downtown, on key transit corridors, and in core commercial areas. <br /> <br />The attached ordinance contains minor revisions to sections 10 and 13 (as compared to the <br />ordinance provided with the public hearing materials) prepared by the City Attorney’s Office to <br />reconcile the language based on the adoption of the code amendments related to the Eugene <br />Water & Electric Board Master Plan. <br /> <br /> <br />S:\CMO\2013 Council Agendas\M130722\S1307224.doc <br />