Laserfiche WebLink
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br />AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY <br /> <br /> Action: An Ordinance Concerning Cell Towers, and Amending Section 9.9750 of the <br /> Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br />Meeting Dates: December 8, 2004 Agenda Item Number: A <br />Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Susan Muir and Jerome Lidz <br />www. ci. eugette, or. us Contact Telephone Number: 682-5208 or 682-5080 <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />On December 6, 2004, the council will hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to EC 9.5750, <br />regulating the siting of cell towers. Action on this item is scheduled for December 8, 2004. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Please refer to the Agenda Item Summary and draft ordinance prepared for the November 22, 2004, City <br />Council public hearing. That public hearing was opened on November 22 and continued to a date <br />certain, December 6, 2004. This Agenda Item Summary was written prior to the public hearing and <br />does not address any testimony that may be submitted after the distribution of the original council <br />packet. <br /> <br />As reported in the original Agenda Item Summary, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to <br />recommend that the council adopt the amendment to require applicants to cover the City's cost of hiring <br />consultants to assist with review of the application. The Planning Commission also voted unanimously <br />to recommend the council add, with full funding, a high priority work program item to the Planning <br />Division work program to thoroughly review Section 9.5750 of the Eugene Code regarding cell tower <br />siting provisions and criteria which included, but were not limited to, aesthetics, effect on property <br />values, appropriate setbacks, upcoming technology, stealth design, co-location on school property and <br />clear and certain language in the code. <br /> <br />If a provider challenged the proposed setbacks in court, as at least one provider has threatened, the cost <br />of defense would include not only the attorneys' time but also retaining expert engineers to consult and <br />testify on the effect of setbacks on providers' ability to provide service. The litigation would also <br />require extensive legal research and briefing to the court, because there are many recent cases involving <br />regulation of cell tower siting, but the law is not yet well settled. The City Attorney's rough estimate of <br />the cost of defending the setbacks is $100,000. A separate legal challenge to a prohibition on <br />interference with emergency communications would be less expensive to defend, but the risk of an <br />adverse result would be greater. <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - A community that retains a high quality of life <br />and a healthy economy, effectively links land use and transportation planning, and successfully manages <br />growth and change in the urban environment <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M041208\S041208A. wpd <br /> <br /> <br />