Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: Acquisition of Beverly/Green Properties <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: October 22, 2007 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Public Works/City Attorney Staff Contact: PW/Kurt Corey - CAO/Glenn Klein <br />www.ci.eugene.or.us Contact Telephone Number: 682-5241/682-5080 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />This is a work session to follow-up the July 9, 2007, work session and motion passed by the council <br />related to the possible acquisition, by condemnation if necessary, of the Beverly and Green properties. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In response to prior City Council direction, a public hearing was held on May 21, 2007, on an ordinance <br />authorizing the use of eminent domain for acquisition of the two parcels in South Eugene. Action was <br />scheduled to occur on July 9, 2007. <br /> <br />On July 9, the council did not act on the ordinance, but instead, passed a motion that directed the City <br />Manager to: a) obtain appraisals for the Beverly and Green properties based on low, medium, and high <br />levels of development intensity, and to contract with whatever other consultants (besides the appraiser) <br />are needed to develop the information that the appraiser needs for his or her appraisal; b) schedule a <br />work session to bring back information related to the property, eminent domain and potential sources of <br />money for the acquisitions; c) bring back the condemnation ordinance after the work session(s) with <br />certain changes spelled out in the motion; and d) report back to the council after the City has contracted <br />with the consultants about when the work session(s) can be held. The motion further directed that the <br />sequence of action was first, bring back the appraisals; second, hold the work session (including <br />executive session); and third, bring back the revised ordinance. A friendly amendment to the motion <br />also stated that the work session should be held in October. <br /> <br />In a memo dated September 6, 2007, the City Attorney’s Office provided an update of the status at that <br />time. The appraisals are not yet completed (the following paragraph describes where the City is in the <br />process). However, because the council’s motion stated that a work session should be held in October, <br />this work session is occurring even though the motion also stated that the sequence of events should <br />begin with the completion of the appraisals. <br /> <br />The council passed its motion on July 9, 2007. Later that month, the City evaluated possible appraisers <br />and selected Powell Valuations. In August, the City met with the appraiser to discuss what information <br />the appraiser needed, and then provided the appraiser with complete sets of all of the applications for the <br />Beverly and Green properties. Those sets included not only the application materials, but also all of the <br />testimony, including the expert reports and testimony submitted by proponents, opponents and any other <br />interested party. Based on the appraiser’s review of that information, the appraiser then identified other <br /> F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071022\S071022B.doc <br /> <br />