Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Public Hearing <br />Council Chamber <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> January 28, 2008 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor, Bonny Bettman, George Poling, <br />Mike Clark, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Solomon. <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. She noted that due <br />to weather conditions the sequence of items on the agenda had been revised. She asked Councilor Pryor to <br />put the motion from the executive session on the floor. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to direct the City Man- <br />ager to proceed with direction from the City Council to accept the option as pre- <br />sented. The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC HEARING: Charles Wiper, Inc. Measure 37 Claim (M37 06-4) <br /> <br />City Manager Angel Jones noted that staff would be responding to all questions in writing. She introduced <br />Gabe Flock, Planning and Development Department, to provide the staff report. <br /> <br />Mr. Flock said the public hearing on the Charles Wiper Measure 37 claim and action on February 11, 2008, <br />were scheduled to comply with an order of the Lane County Circuit Court. He said the City believes that <br />the recent passage of Measure 49 rendered the claimant’s lawsuit moot. Mr. Flock reviewed the history of <br />the claim as set forth in the City Manager's report and recommendation. He said that the new State law <br />(Measure 49) appeared to significantly limit the amount of development potential but the manager's <br />recommendation was based on Measure 37 as it was in effect in May of last year. He said the claim <br />demanded $3.5 million in compensation based on alleged reduction in the fair market value of the property <br />due to various City regulations and in the alternative requested waiver of restrictive land use regulations <br />dating back to original ownership of the property in 1929. He said staff had received numerous letters in <br />support of the manager's recommendation to deny the claim and due to the short agenda and weather <br />concerns the City would accept testimony until 5 p.m. on January 29, 2008. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing and reviewed the rules for providing testimony. <br /> <br />Michael M. Reeder, <br />800 Willamette Street, Suite 800, Eugene, attorney for the claimant, said that packets <br />of materials with a January 28, 2008, cover letter had been hand delivered for the record and to insure <br />inclusion of the appraisal in the original Measure 37 claim. He stated he was unaware of any evidence in <br />the record that rebutted the appraisal and no legal authority was cited to support the conclusion that the <br />claim was invalid. Referring to one of the five requirements for a Measure 37 claim, he said the report <br />discussed the definition of a land use regulation and made a distinction without a difference. He said the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 28, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />