Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- ) . 5 4 % 3 <br /> <br />%´¦¤­¤ #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨« and <br />*®¨­³ 0´¡«¨¢ (¤ ±¨­¦ ¶¨³§ , ­¤ #®´­³¸ "® ±£ ®¥ #®¬¬¨²²¨®­¤±² <br />( ±±¨² ( ««Ǿ ΐΑΔ % ²³ Η Avenue <br />th <br />%´¦¤­¤Ǿ /±¤¦®­ ΘΖΓΏΐ <br /> <br />- ±¢§ ΕǾ ΑΏΐΖ <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />#®´­¢¨«®±² 0±¤²¤­³Ȁ %¬¨«¸ 3¤¬¯«¤, "¤³³¸ 4 ¸«®±Ǿ !« ­ :¤«¤­ª Ǿ '¤®±¦¤ 0®«¨­¦ µ¨  ¯§®­¤Ǿ <br />-¨ª¤ #« ±ª µ¨  ¯§®­¤Ǿ '±¤¦ %µ ­²Ǿ #« ¨±¤ 3¸±¤³³Ǿ #§±¨² 0±¸®± <br /> <br />, ­¤ #®´­³¸ "® ±£ ®¥ #®¬¬¨²²¨®­¤±² 0±¤²¤­³Ȁ * ¸ "®¹¨¤µ¨¢§Ǿ 3¨£,¤¨ª¤­Ǿ 0¤³ 3®±¤­²®­Ǿ & ¸¤ 3³¤¶ ±³Ǿ <br />0 ³ Farr µ¨  ¯§®­¤ <br /> <br /> <br />- ¸®± Vinis ®¯¤­¤£ ³§¤ - ±¢§ ΕǾ ΑΏΐ7Ǿ ¬¤¤³¨­¦ ®¥ ³§¤ %´¦¤­¤ #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨«. <br />#®¬¬¨²²¨®­¤± Bozievich ®¯¤­¤£ ³§¤ - ±¢§ ΕǾ ΑΏΐΖ, ¬¤¤³¨­¦ ®¥ ³§¤ , ­¤ #®´­³¸ "® ±£ ®¥ #®¬¬¨²²¨®­¤±²ȁ <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Concerning Long Range Transportation Planning; <br />1. <br />Adopting the Eugene 2035 Transportation System Plan; Amending the Eugene-Springfield <br />Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan); Amending the Eugene-Springfield <br />Metropolitan AreaTransportation Plan (TransPlan); Amending Sections 9.050, 9.8010, 9.9650, <br />of the Eugene Code, 1971; Amending the Street Classification Map; Amending Ordinance No. <br />20528 (to Delete Section 67); Repealing Section 9.9525 of the Eugene Code, 1971, Repealing <br />Ordinance No. 20322 (2003 Central Area Transportation Study); and Providing for an <br />Effective Date. <br />1.Rob Zako–Supported the TSP but wanted more mixed-modal transportation options. <br />2.Sue Wolling–Supported more funding and focus on mixed-modal transportation options. <br />3.Cindy Allen–Supported working closelywith neighborhoods on adoption of theplan. <br />4.Shane MacRhodes–Supported safer streets and incorporating Vision Zero as a priority. <br />5.Coreal Riday-White–Supported the TSP addressing GHG emissions and using TDM tools. <br />6.Sarah Mazze–Supported prioritizing bike and pedestrian projects and safer routes. <br />7.Howard Saxion–Supported an implementation plan approach to achieve success. <br />8.John Faville–Worried local needs might get lost; coordinatewith land use planning. <br />9.Frannie Brindle–Supported timely adoption of the plan and safety upgrades to Beltline. <br />10.John Hagen–Opposed to addition of an arterial bridge on Beltline that adds traffic to Hunsaker. <br />11.Allen Hancock–Supported clearer objective policies than can be tested in the plan. <br />12.Josh Koshinsky–Supported the TSP; will make Eugene a better place to live and work. <br />13.Laurie Powell–Supported prioritizing bike and pedestrian projects and using climate benchmarks. <br />14.Jim Neu–Supported prioritizing bike and pedestrian projects and using climate benchmarks. <br />15.Seth Sadofsky–Supported inclusion of the CRO and Vision Zero goals in the TSP. <br />16.Laughton Elliot-DeAngelis-Supported prioritizing bike and pedestrian projects and safer routes. <br />17.Peter Bolander–Concerned that no projects address the Beltline/River Road interchange. <br />18.Mark Robinowitz–Supported low-build option for Beltline as traffic and oil has peaked. <br />19.Teresa Bishow–Opposed to reclassification of Shadowview; willhinder economics of area. <br />20. Matt McRae–Supported a TSP that meetssafety, climate, and funding goals. <br />MINUTES –Eugene City CouncilMarch 6, 2017Page 1 <br />JEO Public Hearing <br /> <br />