|
<br />1-.3
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />II
<br />I
<br />
<br />'..
<br />
<br />Council Chamber
<br />Eugene, Oregon
<br />January 26, 1970
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />'1
<br />j
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />II
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />1\
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />
<br />Adj ourned meet ing of the Common Coune~L of. the city of Eugene, Oregon was called to ordeE by His
<br />Honor Hes.terE. Andersen at 7:30 .p.m. on January,26, 1970 in the Council Chamber with. the following
<br />councilmen present: . Mrs. HaYward; Messrs. McDonald,<~~j:-dy-'~nd_ Teague; Mrs. Beal; Messrs. Gribskov.
<br />Mohr and Williams.
<br />
<br />.,
<br />
<br />Minutes of the meeting held January ~2, 1970, as mailed to Co~~cil members, were approved with the
<br />following' corrections:
<br />
<br />2nd paragraph, Page 2., change "mobi.le'.home development" to "dental clinic", and correct Mr.
<br />f'atton"s name ~l;"om "Bob". to,'Clyde"': (Wi:th th~se. chq.nges,. the minutes' were, approved.
<br />
<br />Presentation, Director of Community Services - Mrs. Lucille Russell of the Mental ,Health Center
<br />presented .the.' Mayor and ~emb~rs of ,th~. CouncJl copies ,of;.a Direct,or of Community Services. She'
<br />said the County has volunteered to keep the Directory up to date.
<br />
<br />M~yor.A~derso~ thanke'd Mr's. Russell for one giant step toward improved and: more meaningful volunteer
<br />service iI)., ,this co'mmuni,~y. .'
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />. COMMITTEE REPORTS
<br />
<br />Committee meeting held January 21, 1970:
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />"Present: Councilmen , McDQn.ald, Pur.dy, Beal, Gribskov, Mohr and Willi;;ms; City l1anager and staff;
<br />and others.
<br />
<br />1. Items from Mayor and Council
<br />il. Rezoning, .19th and .Aga~e"", .~o.ftmcilmC!n ,Williams, in ,relation to .therezoning approved,
<br />at the January 12 meeting for RG zrnhillhg on p~operty, located.at 19th Avenue and' Agate
<br />Street, moved seconded by Mrs~ Hayward that this be sent forward only with' the
<br />cond;i.tions>., t;hat prs., PeilrJ" and Cha1l).b~rs enter, into a bindingco.?tract ,with the City
<br />to insure' that. the development occurs as planned; and that all the developments
<br />\ . . .
<br />occur,at oIte timE?
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />I!
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />
<br />
<br />'I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal was concerned that financing was a problem at this time, and that the
<br />P'lanning: Commission pad .qgreed to ,development in two phases..
<br />
<br />Mr.hfi).:liams-J2oncer-n. Wils> tpat, the dev~lopme~t' might not be,compl~.ted and would
<br />adversely affect the :neighQorpood. Mrs. H.ayward: felt it. p.o$sible a foundatio~ might
<br />be constructed and bEicomeari eyesor.e to the neighborhood.
<br />
<br />In answer to a question concerning legality of a contract to bind the developer to
<br />~<?mpletion, th~q.ty AttorneY,~ilid ,a contract could be written binding: hot. only the
<br />present'developer,. but any subsequent owner of th,e property.
<br />
<br />. '
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />T~ere w{ls; ~i$cus9ton, concerni~g .pos.s;i,ble,soJ,utions to. problems conC3rning the,
<br />neighborhood. ~
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved, seconded by Mrs. -Hayward, to amend the s.econdpart of his motion
<br />re~ating to':~he r~quirem~nt that it, be done ~ntirely at one time, to require that
<br />if. it} if? ,I,lot c;omp:j..et~~ at', one.. tim~, '. the other Ipt' be, cleared ilnd left,;in :a p,resent~
<br />'able condit.ion. '
<br />
<br />. ,
<br />Vote taken on ,motion as am~nded. Motion'carried.
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />Mr: McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teqgue to approve Item la of the Committee report.
<br />
<br />",-
<br />
<br />,.
<br />II
<br />II
<br />
<br />,I
<br />r
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />.' .-
<br />In answer .to CouncilmaI,l Hayward's question, Director of Planning expl'ained that- under .Planned ,Unit
<br />Development pr~cedure~ there are certain .requirements which are mandatory, whe~eas, a conditional
<br />use gives some flexibility. In either case, an additional public hearing is held which gives
<br />citillEms a chance for review. . '
<br />
<br />Vote taken on motion as stated. :Motion ca-r.td;ed.
<br />~'. , "
<br />
<br />b. Resolution, 400 Uni,ts Additiona-lLow-.Rent Housing - Mr. Gribsko.v said, regarding the
<br />Joint Housing Commission Resolutron preyiously heard~ there have been new develop-
<br />memts ~ and he a.sked Mrs: Nivent~ .,outline th~m. ..
<br />
<br />I
<br />II
<br />.1
<br />!i
<br />i:
<br />
<br />. ," , . . /
<br />Mrs. Betty Niv~n, :Planning Commission member, s'aid the Housing E?Cpediter had determined
<br />that' the -Lutheran Layman' s .~eqgu~ submitted a proposal for, a rent ~up'plement" 'project
<br />to, the D~part:'ment of Housing. and 'Urban Development\, and that they had' received what
<br />they termed an or.al commitment from FHA for their 'project. Mrs. Niven said she had
<br />subsequently been informed that FHA . gives no oral ,commitments. She proposed two changes
<br />in the--Resolution to assure' developers th,at their./requests would not be j eopard~z,ed
<br />by the Joint Housing C01l).mittee resolution. She proposed that the 400 units requested
<br />be changed- to 300 units, and if the private housing ,did not materialize, ~ subsequent
<br />proposal could be submitted for an additional 100 units.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Council members felt with the extreme shortage of low income housing, that the
<br />Resolution should still be submitted for 400 units. Mrs. Niven read a letter from
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~'
<br />
<br />1/26/70 - 1
<br />
|