Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room-City Hall <br /> <br /> August 13, 2003 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Gary Pap~, Nancy Nathanson, Scott Meisner, David Kelly, Betty <br /> Taylor Bonny Bettman, George Poling, Jennifer Solomon. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />A.WORK SESSION: Discussion Concerning Transportation System Maintenance Fee <br /> <br />The council was joined for the item by Lane County Commissioner Bobby Green. Mr. Green <br />thanked the council for the opportunity to participate, and indicated he would listen first to the <br />discussion and then provide input, noting that he was only one of five members of the Lane <br />County Board of County Commissioners. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called on the council for comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner indicated a preference to retain the transportation system maintenance fee (TSMF) as <br />a tool, but judged that from the calls and e-mail messages he received, there would be no one <br />campaigning to keep it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, moved to direct staff to return with <br /> an ordinance to repeal the TSMF. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly indicated opposition to the motion because of his concern over the loss of the TSMF as <br />a tool and his concern that people would perceive that the council backed down in the face of <br />initiative petitions. He noted that parties such as the council, the board, and the Eugene Area <br />Chamber of Commerce agreed that there was a funding gap for street maintenance. The TSMF <br />would raise $7 million annually. He asked Mr. Green to suggest alternatives to fill that gap. Mr. <br />Green said that the question was a good one, but a better one might be what the City's priorities <br />were. He thought the County's partnership with the City over the past ten years was well- <br />documented. He said that a regional solution involving all Lane County communities was the best <br />solution. Mr. Kelly agreed with Mr. Green that the issue was a countywide issue. He said that a <br />regional solution would require more funding, but he had heard nothing from any critic of the <br />TSMF suggesting a solution to funding the need. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson noted her previous interest in a moratorium. She thought it represented a good- <br />faith effort, and was disappointed that was not enough for the opponents of the fee. The logical <br />next step toward a lasting solution was to do what it took to set the stage for community dialogue. <br />For that reason, she supported the motion. If the only way to have the discussion was by <br />repealing the ordinance, the council needed to take that action. She wanted to ensure a level <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 13, 2003 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />