Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room--Eugene City Hall <br /> <br /> April 10, 2002 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: David Kelly, Gary Pap~, Nancy Nathanson, Scott Meisner, Pat Fart, <br /> Betty Taylor, Gary Rayor, Bonny Bettman. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br /> <br />Mayor James D. Torrey called the meeting to order. <br /> <br />A.WORK SESSION: An Ordinance Concerning Solid Waste, Yard Debris and Recycling, and <br /> Amending Sections 3.005, 3.245, 3.247, 3.250, 3.270, and 4.855 of the Eugene Code, <br /> 1971; Amending and Renumbering Sections 3.265, 3.275, and 3.284 of That Code; <br /> Repealing Sections 3.260, 3.272, and 3.282 of that Code; and Adding a New Section <br /> 3.290 to That Code <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey noted that Mr. Pap~ had recused himself from the discussion due to a conflict of <br />interest. <br /> <br />Nancy Young of the Planning and Development Department reviewed the ordinance, noting that it <br />largely consisted of housekeeping changes. She highlighted the shift of the rate criteria to a new <br />Solid Waste Rate Review Manual, the addition of text regarding customer responsibilities, and <br />revisions to Chapter 4 of the code related to the placement of receptacles on sidewalks. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Fart regarding current public feedback on the yard debris <br />program, Ms. Young said that staff was receiving few, if any, calls, and comments she heard were <br />generally supportive of the program. Mr. Fart indicated his appreciation for the program. He said <br />that many large lot owners did not share his appreciation. He determined from Ms. Young that the <br />biennial rate review would occur in May 2002, and that the City Manager had the authority over <br />rates. The council was free to offer the manager input on the rate-setting process. Mr. Fart <br />wondered if there was a way to measure community discontent with the program. Ms. Young said <br />the City would conduct a customer satisfaction survey in fall 2002. She suggested that one <br />indicator of satisfaction would be the number of customers who shifted from larger containers to <br />21 gallon containers, and said she would keep the council informed of what staff learned. Mr. Fart <br />noted his own shift from a 35-gallon container to a 20-gallon container. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly questioned why the hauler responsibilities were being shifted from the code to the <br />administrative rules while the customer responsibilities were being codified. He thought the <br />hauler and customer responsibilities should both be in the code, or both be in the administrative <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 10, 2002 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />