Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Public Hearing <br />Council Chamber—Eugene City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> February 20, 2007 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor, Bonny Bettman, Jennifer Solomon, <br />George Poling, Mike Clark, Alan Zelenka. <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. She asked those present to <br />acknowledge the tragic death of Nathan McBryde at Willamette Pass Ski area the previous weekend with a <br />moment of silence, and to reach out to his family. She said it was a loss for the entire community. <br /> <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC HEARING: FY08-13 Draft Capital Improvement Program <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Roxie Cuellar <br />, 2053 Laura Street, representing the Home Builders Association of Lane County and <br />Homebuilders Construction Company, expressed her organizations’ concern about the $51 million in parks <br />projects included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). She said the association supported parks but <br />objected that the City had not acknowledged the impact of its proposed parks acquisitions on the land <br />supply. When the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive (PROS) Plan was remanded by the <br />Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), that agency ruled the plan could not be a stand-alone document, and at <br />least part of it must be adopted as a refinement plan. LUBA also ruled that if the portion of the PROS plan <br />adopted as a refinement plan did not include a precise estimate of the acreages required for parks, recreation, <br />and open space facilities, it was unlikely the City would be able to justify a Metro Plan parks, recreation, <br />and open space facilities element refinement plan if it failed to included mandatory standards that governed <br />the selection and improvement of individual parks sites in the future. While there were standards in the <br />PROS Plan related to acres-per-thousand residents for different park types, those were not mandatory <br />standards. Ms. Cueller said the City had not dealt with the remand and had no mandatory standards. She <br />thought the inclusion of the parks projects without those standards was in violation of the LUBA remand. <br /> <br />Ms. Cueller discussed the issue of local wastewater lines, saying there was a lot of low-density land included <br />in the urban growth boundary west of the city that could not be built on because it did not have services. <br />The Residential Lands Study, acknowledged in 1999, outlined when areas were likely to receive service. <br />Most of the area was slated to have service within seven to ten years, and that time was quickly approach- <br />ing. She said if the council declined to look at the land supply, it should consider extending services. <br /> <br />Carlos Barara <br />, Olive Street, asked that the CIP include funding for Washington Park to allow for the <br />conversion of the wading pool to a spray pool so small children could use it during the warm summer <br />months. The Friendly Area Neighborhood Association supported the expenditure. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 20, 2007 Page 1 <br /> Public Hearing <br />