Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> March 15, 1999 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Scott Meisner, Pat Fart, David Kelly, Bobby Lee, Nancy Nathanson, <br /> Gary Pap~, Gary Rayor, Betty Taylor. <br /> <br /> I. CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />The adjourned March 10, 1999, Eugene City Council meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m.; <br />His Honor Mayor James D. Torrey presiding. <br /> <br /> II. PROCESS SESSION: GOALS SETTING <br /> <br />Mary Walston, City Manager's Office, referred the council to the meeting packet and asked if <br />there were anything not captured in the draft of the operating agreements. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly noted, as he had in a previous e-mail message to all members of the council, that it was <br />not specifically stated in the operating agreements that council members would respond to public <br />testimony given at public hearings immediately after closing the public hearing. <br /> <br />The council asked that the section on public hearings should be clarified using language similar <br />to that under the public forum but deleting the two-minute limit on council members. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said council members do not directly question people giving public testimony-- <br />something that is done in other venues, e.g., Planning Commission meetings. She wondered if <br />the council might want to allow itself that flexibility. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey asked the council to clarify its desire regarding time limits for members following public <br />testimony at public hearings. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly recalled that the council's decision from the February work session was that council <br />responses at the end of the public forum period would be limited to two minutes per member but <br />there would be no limit set for comments by the council following a public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said Mr. Kelly was correct. He commented that if the Planning Commission, in "the <br />highly ritualistic and legalistic world of land use law," can find a way to clarify public testimony by <br />allowing some interaction, the council should be able to do it if that is its decision. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr said the issue for him was the amount of time the council spent in meetings and he <br />preferred that council members needing additional information seek it outside that meeting. He <br />noted the council's ground rule that action not be taken at public hearings, which allowed time for <br />clarification of issues by individual members. <br /> <br />Minutes-Eugene City Council March 15, 1999 Page 1 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />