Laserfiche WebLink
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 21-05-06-F <br />of the <br /> City' Manager of the City of Eugene <br /> <br />AMENDMENT OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS FEE <br />SCHEDULE; REPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 21-04-02-F; <br />AND REPEAL OF THE PROVISIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER <br />NOS. 44-92-05, 53-04-01-F, AND 5%02-08-F THAT ARE IN CONFLICT' <br />THEREWITH. <br /> <br />The City Manager of the City of Eugene finds as follows: <br /> <br /> A. Section 2.020 of the Eugene, Code, 1971 authorizes the City Manager to <br />determine and set fees and charges to be imposed by the City for services, goods, use of <br />municipal property, and licenses and per'its. ~ accord;ance with thos~ provisions, <br />Administrative order No. 21-04-02-F was issued on February 2~ 2004, adopting ~ amended <br />Public Records Fee Schedule. <br /> <br /> B. In accordance with the above procedures, on July 5, 2005~ I issued Administrative <br />Order No. 21-05-06, and notified the Mayor and City Councilors that I intended to amend the <br />Public Records ReqUests Fee Schedule as set forth in the Notice attached as Exhibit A to that <br />Administrative order. <br /> <br /> C. Notice was also posted at two locations at City Hall on July 7~ 2005, and made <br />svailable for inspection by interested persons at the office of the City Manager, 777 Pearl Street, <br />Eugene, Oregor~i 97401, ~uring no~al business hours (8:00 AM to 5:00 t~M, Monday through <br />Friday, exclusive of holidays). The Notice provided that written comments would be received <br />for a Period of 15 days from the date of Posting and publication. No written comments -were <br />received within the time or in the manner provided in the Notice. <br /> <br /> Based upon the above findings and the findings in Administrative Order No. 2~-05-06, l <br />find that the Public Records Requests Fee Schedule should be amended as proposed. My <br />determination of the fee amendments was made after considering the applicable policies, <br />enactments and directives of the City Council, the amount charged for these services by the City <br />in the past, the full costs of providing these serVices supported by the fees, the amounts charged <br />by other comparable providers,~ and ~he revenue needs o? the Cit~ as determined by the adopted <br />City budget. The f~es should become effective as of the date of this order, Administrative Order <br />No. 21-04-02-F should be repealed~ and the provisions of AdminiStrative Order Nos. 44-92-05, <br />53~04~01-F, and 57-02~08-F that are in conflict with the Public Records Requests Fee Schedule, <br />should be repeale& <br /> <br />On the basis of these findings, I order that: <br /> <br />Administrative Order - Page <br /> <br /> <br />