Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> McNutt Room, 777 Pearl Street, Eugene <br /> <br /> October 11, 1999 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Scott Meisner, Pat Farr, David Kelly, Bobby Lee, Gary PapS, Gary <br /> Rayor, Betty Taylor. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: Nancy Nathanson. <br /> <br />The adjourned September 22, 1999, Eugene City Council meeting was called to order at 5:30 <br />p.m.; His Honor Mayor James D. Torrey presiding. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: FRANKLIN BOULEVARD-WILLAMETTE RIVER AREA WORK PLAN <br /> <br />Department of Planning and Development Executive Director Paul Farmer introduced the topic, calling <br />attention to the wall charts reflecting the area(s) under discussion. Mr. Farmer said this followed the council's <br />discussion two weeks ago on the downtown area and this additional work has resulted in a slightly different <br />staff conclusion. He indicated the presentation would be on the Riverfront urban renewal district minus the <br />Riverfront Research Park, saying the goal was to develop a process to provide leadership for the development <br />of this area. Mr. Farmer said he learned that local government had four sets of tools for guiding change: 1) <br />advice, e.g., the growth management policies; 2) controls, e.g., through regulation; 3) incentives, e.g., tax <br />abatement, zoning bonuses; and 4) development. Mr. Farmer narrated a Powerpoint presentation giving <br />background information and describing the program's goals, the two complementary processes (downtown <br />and Franklin Boulevard/Willamette River areas), and the themes behind those processes. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr arrived at the meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Farmer said the purpose of the overall study was to articulate a coordinated vision for the area that was <br />not only "an aspiration of where we want to take the community but one which would also be achievable." He <br />indicated that the work would be divided into the following general categories: open space and natural <br />resources; land use and development; access and mobility; and, public infrastructure and regulation. He said <br />within these, the study would be dealing with specific issues such as Agripac, Eugene Water & Electric Board <br />(EWEB), Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), and General Services Administration (GSA). Mr. Farmer said staff <br />recommended using a council advisory committee (CAC), holding a series of workshops involving <br />interdepartmental teams, and using input from consultants. The project would take from 12 to 18 months and <br />cost approximately $175,000, with the Lane Transit District (LTD) as a possible partner. <br />Mr. Meisner wondered about the possibility of EWEB partnering as well. Mr. Farmer said that was a good <br />possibility. He identified the funding sources as the Riverfront Urban Renewal District Capital Projects Fund <br />and LTD, and possibly EWEB and others. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 11, 1999 Page 1 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />