Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> November 9, 1998 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Pat Fart, Tim Laue, Bobby Lee, Scott Meisner, Nancy Nathanson, <br /> Laurie Swanson Gribskov, Betty Taylor Betty Taylor, Ken Tollenaar. <br /> <br /> I. CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />The November 9, 1998, Eugene City Council meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m.; His Honor <br />Mayor James D. Torrey presiding. <br /> <br />The council reversed agenda items II and III at Mr. Laue's request, as he was arriving late. <br /> <br /> II. WORK SESSION: REVISIONS TO CITY'S VOTER'S PAMPHLET SIGNATURE <br /> GATHERING PROCESS <br /> <br />Kate Fieland, Deputy City Recorder, provided the staff report. She recalled that in previous <br />discussions about the use of paid petitioners in the gathering of signatures for placing arguments <br />in the voter's pamphlet, the council had been advised that prohibiting paid signature gatherers <br />was unconstitutional. At that time, she continued, the council decided that: 1) groups using paid <br />signature gatherers would have to pay a $500 fee; 2) the signature gatherer would have to wear <br />a button identifying himself or herself as paid; and 3) the petitions themselves would indicate that <br />the person gathering the signatures was being paid. Ms. Fieland said during summer 1998 the <br />City Manager received a letter from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) asking the City to <br />review fee requirements. Ms. Fieland said the proposed ordinance does away with the fee and <br />the requirement that gatherers wear buttons, adding that was staff's recommendation. She <br />explained that the City has limited resources to enforce the button requirement, resulting in <br />"uneven" compliance. Ms. Fieland added that a similar requirement for initiative signature <br />gathering does not exist. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glenn Klein said that if a lawsuit challenging these requirements was filed, it would <br />be a very expensive process for the City as they have not been tested in the courts. He said <br />there are some reasonable arguments that can be put forward to defend the requirements, but <br />the council must decide if it was worth the expense--about $100,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said people have a general frustration about the initiative process, which was <br />focused on paid signature gathering. He called the button requirement "overkill "but opposed <br />eliminating the fee altogether, favoring instead a requirement for 300 signatures or $300 to <br />include an argument in the voter's pamphlet. He said the fee was justified to cover the expenses <br />of printing the pamphlet. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 9, 1998 Page 1 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />