Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br />McNutt Room—Eugene City Hall <br /> <br /> October 12, 2005 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Poling, Jennifer Solomon, Bonny Bettman, David Kelly, Betty <br />Taylor, Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: Gary Papé. <br /> <br /> <br />In the absence of Mayor Kitty Piercy, Council President George Poling called the October 12, 2005, work <br />session of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: ORDINANCE CONCERNING CHAMBERS SPECIAL AREA ZONE <br /> <br />Senior Planner Allen Lowe of the Planning Division provided a PowerPoint presentation entitled “Chambers <br />Reconsidered,” which summarized the Chambers Reconsidered Project, a project to implement the mixed- <br />use concept in the neighborhood. He shared a series of aerial photographs to demonstrate the boundaries of <br />the study area and changes in the area over time, including examples of higher density infill developments <br />that occurred and created neighborhood resistance to such developments. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe reviewed the history of the project, noting it began in fall 2004 with an exploration of issues and <br />values. Participants identified variables that could be manipulated to influence neighborhood character. <br />The process resulted in development standards intended to ensure a higher degree of compatibility with <br />existing development. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe shared slides showing the area impacted by the draft zoning code, noting not all parts of the <br />neighborhood would be affected by the new standards. He pointed out the area known as the East <br />Traditional Neighborhood (ETN), the area of most concern to the members of the Chambers Area Families <br />for Healthy Neighborhoods (CAFHN). The development standards would be applied to the ETN. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe said the aim of the project was to allow an existing developed neighborhood to intensify while <br />preserving its essential character. Defining characteristics of the neighborhood included the grid street <br />system, alleys, and the patterns of the sidewalks, as well as the lot sizes, building forms, and relationship of <br />the buildings to the street. The draft code was structured around those characteristics. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe said as the process went on, participants realized the allowed levels of density in the R-2 zone <br />predisposed the area to wholesale redevelopment as opposed to selective infill. Much of the study area was <br />designated for medium-density development, which also encouraged higher densities and attached multi- <br />family dwellings. However, the neighborhood current consisted largely of detached dwellings. Mr. Lowe <br />said the process considered building form, lot area, width, and depth, density, building height, and side yard <br />setbacks. He said process also considered neighborhood character, such as front yard setback, roof pitch, <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 12, 2005 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />