Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br />McNutt Room—Eugene City Hall <br /> <br /> September 28, 2005 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Poling, Jennifer Solomon, Bonny Bettman, David Kelly, Betty <br />Taylor, Gary Papé, Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor. <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order and welcomed those present. <br /> <br /> <br />A. ACTION: An Ordinance Concerning Smoking Areas; Amending Sections 6.225, 6.230, 6.235, <br />and 6.240 of the Eugene Code, 1971; Repealing Section 6.232 of that Code; and Adding Section 6.245 <br />to that Code <br /> <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Ms. Solomon, moved to request the City Manager to revise Ad- <br />ministrative Rule 6.230 to clarify standards for outdoor smoking areas and to prepare ordi- <br />nance revisions as appropriate, within a timeframe that allows new standards to be in place <br />before December 31, 2005. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé asked about Corvallis’ experience in implementing a similar ordinance. Permit Review Manager <br />Keli Osborn replied that the clean air ordinance for Corvallis was countywide and primarily handled by <br />Benton County Public Health, but also administered within the City of Corvallis. She said that for <br />Corvallis, according to staff there, three to five citations had been issued over the past three years and while <br />citations with fines were issued when violations persisted, the usual experience was that businesses that were <br />approached regarding a violation immediately corrected the problem. She said that outdoor smoking areas <br />were not defined in the Benton County ordinance and staff’s focus was to keep smokers ten feet or more <br />away from building entrances and exits. She said some businesses might have a sheltered area but smoking <br />areas were not considered enclosed. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé asked about Eugene’s experience with complaints under its ordinance. Ms. Osborn said that there <br />had been 16 complaints related to the smoking ordinance since the first of the year; 11 related to outdoor <br />smoking areas and 5 related to smoking indoors. She said that since July 2001, the City issued 30 <br />correction orders, levied 12 fines and gone to appeal hearings 9 times. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé requested details abut the nature of the complaints related to outdoor smoking areas. Ms. Osborn <br />said the focus of complaints was whether standards had been met and whether the area was too enclosed, <br />given the 25 percent/75 percent rule now in place. She said the tracking system identified a complaint as <br />related to not meeting standards but did not provide specific details; 15 of the 16 complaints received in <br />2005 were confidential. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 28, 2005 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />