Laserfiche WebLink
X. 1Z 1�� <br />Eugene City Council <br />Public Hearing/Work Session <br />Council Chamber <br />777 Pearl Street Eugene, Oregon <br />April 19, 201 <br />7:30 p.m. <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Mike Clark, Betty Taylor, George Poling, George Brown, Alan Zelenka, <br />Jennifer Solomon, Andrea Ortiz. <br />Her Honor Mayor Ditty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br />1. PUBLIC HEARING <br />An ordinance Adopting an Amended Urban Renewal Plan for the Downtown Urban Renewal <br />District <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz provided an overview of the proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan amendment <br />and four targeted downtown projects. He said the amendment for the four proposed projects only would <br />increase the plan's spending limit by $16.1 million, expand the boundary if the Veterans' Administration <br />(VA) chose a downtown site for its clinic, impose a sunset provision and establish an annual review panel. <br />He said the council was scheduled to review comments from the public, Planning Commission and taxing <br />districts at its May 14, 2010, work session, with action on the amendment scheduled for May 24. He noted <br />that a frequently raised concern was the impact of the urban renewal district on School District 4J and stated <br />that an analysis by the county assessor, in which the school district concurred, concluded that the school <br />district was better off financially if the downtown urban renewal district continued. Specifically, the school <br />district would lose $117,000 annually if the district was terminated. <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing and recited the procedures for providing testimony. <br />Sue Prichard, Emerald Street, Eugene, ward 3, said she was a semi - retired real estate broker and much of <br />her professional activities had focused on the leasing and sales of downtown properties. She thanked the <br />council for its commitment to downtown and developing a sensible, comprehensive plan. She said the past <br />had proved that no one project was the solution for downtown, it was a complex puzzle that required a <br />number of simultaneous activities in the public and private sectors and a continued commitment over time. <br />She strongly supported a favorable vote to amend the urban renewal plan as proposed. It was a timely step <br />forward and without it time would pass and nothing would change. She said tax increment financing was an <br />effective tool and one of the few available to the City for downtown revitalization. She said all of the <br />projects were important and well thought -out, particularly construction of a Lane Community College (LCC) <br />campus downtown. Her life had been changed by the opportunity to attend LCC and there were thousands <br />of similar stories in the community. <br />Ben Sappington, Mecca Avenue, Eugene, ward S, stressed the need for a thriving downtown and its <br />importance to the economic well -being of the community and retention of young, talented workers central to <br />the community's success. He urged the council to focus on the future and take advantage of projects that <br />were ready to move forward now and an immediately available funding source that did not raise taxes or <br />detract from public education. He fully supported the proposed urban renewal plan amendment. <br />MINUTES Eugene City Council April 19, 201.0 Page I <br />Public Hearing <br />