Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room — Eugene City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street — Eugene, Oregon <br />September 22, 2010 <br />Noon <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Mike Clark, Betty Taylor, Jennifer Solomon, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, Chris <br />Pryor, Alan Zelenka, George Brown, members. <br />In the absence of Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy, Council President Mike Clark called the September 22, 2010, <br />work session of the Eugene City Council to order. <br />A. WORK SESSION: Council Subcommittee on Street Assessment Policy <br />Assistant City Manager Sarah Medary introduced City Engineer Mark Schoening and Data Manager Fred McVey, <br />who provided a PowerPoint presentation on the recommendations of the Council Subcommittee on Street <br />Assessment Policy for future street assessments. The subcommittee members were councilors Taylor, Solomon, <br />and Poling. <br />Mr. Schoening noted the charge adopted by the subcommittee, which was to examine the current code regarding <br />street assessments for possible changes that would address inequities in the code identified by the council in its <br />past discussions. Those inequities were related to financing, local improvement district (LID) boundaries, and how <br />individual properties were assessed. <br />Mr. Schoening and Mr. McVey reviewed the subcommittee's consensus recommendations and shared slides of <br />actual improvement projects to illustrate the impact of each recommendation. <br />• The subcommittee did not recommend changing the Eugene Code to extend the assessment payment period <br />because the code currently allowed extension of the payment period through the ordinance levying the as- <br />sessments for individual projects. <br />• The subcommittee recommended allowing deferral of street assessments until the sale or transfer of prop- <br />erty, limited to owner - occupied single-family and duplex homes and contingent on the availability of <br />funds. <br />• The subcommittee recommended including cul -de -sac and dead -end street properties within the local <br />improvement district of the unimproved street to which they connect. The properties would be assessed at <br />the same rate as abutting properties. Dead -end streets would be determined at the time of LID formation. <br />Unimproved cul -de -sacs and dead -end streets should be improved at the time the unimproved street to <br />which they connect was improved, with all of the improvement costs shared within the LID. <br />• The subcommittee did not recommend a "travel shed" approach to establishing the boundaries of an LID <br />due to the complexity of identifying the benefitting properties. <br />MINUTES —City Council September 22, 2010 Page 1 <br />Work Session <br />