Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room —City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street — Eugene, Oregon <br />January 26, 2011 <br />Noon <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Betty Taylor, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, Chris Pryor, <br />Alan Zelenka, Pat Farr. <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the January 26, 2011, work session of the Eugene City Council to <br />order. <br />A. WORK SESSION: Envision Eugene Update – Environmental Stewardship <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz introduced Rusty Rexius, Larry Banks, and Kate Perle of the Community <br />Resource Group (CRG), who were attending the presentation to offer the council their perspective on the <br />topic. Planning Director Lisa Gardner, Metro Community Manager Carolyn Weiss, Associate Planner <br />Heather O'Donnell, Senior Planner Rob Hostick, and Climate and Energy Analyst Matt McRae were also <br />present for the item. <br />City Manager Ruiz led the council through the first part of a PowerPoint presentation on the <br />Environmental Stewardship element of the Envision Eugene process, and Mr. Hostick and Mr. McRae <br />continued the presentation by framing the environmental stewardship concept in more detail. Councilors <br />asked questions to clarify the specifics of the information presented. <br />Mayor Piercy solicited comments from the CRG members present. <br />Mr. Banks said that architects such as he had "drank the Koolaid." They believed in the information that <br />had been outlined in the presentation and were striving to convince people it made sense to address the <br />issues involved. He said it was important to watch the community's investments in its transportation <br />system, and to use the system to facilitate greater density within the current urban growth boundary and <br />close to the core. He anticipated that transit corridors would create synergy for the investments made. <br />Mr. Banks suggested that fixed -route transit was an incentive for private development. He acknowledged <br />there were questions about some of the data supporting the process and that the process might not be <br />perfect, but he believed that overall the process had been very good. <br />Ms. Perle said the Envision Eugene process had been an educational opportunity as well as an exercise in <br />coalition building. She then went on to speak of her interest in preserving agricultural land for local food <br />production and suggested that the community needed to go beyond the State requirements for 20 -year <br />land supplies to ensure a livable, thriving community in the future and make the best use of the land <br />inside the UGB. She believed that would result in more gain for the community and create a synergy that <br />led to a viable, livable, workable, compact community. <br />Ms. Perle acknowledged she had been skeptical at the outset of the process but over time had been <br />convinced of its utility and believed it could lead to a workable future. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council January 26, 2011 Page 1 <br />Work Session <br />