Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: Eugene-Springfield Fire Service Merger Update <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: October 26, 2011 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Fire and EMS Department Staff Contact: Chief Randall B. Groves <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: (541) 682-7115 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />In an era of financial challenge, new and creative solutions are necessary for sustaining core community <br />services, particularly in fire prevention, suppression, rescue, and emergency medical services (EMS). To <br />this end, completed elements of the functional consolidation feature new and more efficient ways to <br />provide fire and emergency medical services by skillfully combining the strengths of the Eugene Fire & <br />EMS and the Springfield Fire & Life Safety Departments through the use of multi-role, multi-skilled <br />personnel and eliminating unnecessary duplication. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In June 2007, the two cities effectively eliminated jurisdictional boundaries for the purposes of <br />emergency fire, rescue, first-response EMS, hazardous materials and ambulance transport. The closest <br />and most appropriate resource is now dispatched, regardless of jurisdiction. This approach, known as <br />the 3-Battalion Response System, has resulted in faster initial response to emergencies, as well as better <br />backup coverage to ensure that a safe level of resources are available throughout the Eugene-Springfield <br />metro area. The only tangible costs have been associated with a limited amount of staff time and the <br />minimal one-time cost of renumbering some fire stations and vehicles into a single cohesive system. <br /> <br />In 2009, the two departments commissioned a study of potential further collaboration by Emergency <br />Services Consulting International (ESCI). The study results were presented to elected officials in June <br />2009, and discussed at a follow-up meeting in September. <br /> <br />Elected officials also received, as background for the December 7, 2009, Joint Elected Officials <br />Meeting, a detailed report explaining what the consolidation would entail in each functional area of both <br />departments. At that meeting, members of the Springfield City Council voted unanimously in support of <br />initial steps, while members of the Eugene City Council voted to consider the matter further while <br />meeting as a single body. <br /> <br />In July 2010, the two departments entered into a “functional consolidation” which involved the sharing <br />of a number of key management and administrative positions through an inter-governmental agreement <br />(IGA). This agreement allowed both cities to achieve a combined projected annualized savings of <br />$562,000 beginning in FY11. At the close of FY11, these projections were exceeded with an actual <br />savings of $606,999 (Attachment 1). These savings resulted from the elimination of a number of <br />positions which were eliminated through attrition. This led to a reshuffling of responsibilities and a new <br />organizational structure (see attached organizational chart) to manage the functional consolidation. <br /> <br />S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111026\S111026B.doc <br />