Laserfiche WebLink
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br />AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY <br /> <br /> Work Session: Transportation Funding for Pavement Preservation <br /> <br />Meeting Date: September 27, 2004 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Kurt Corey <br />www. cl. eugene, or. us Contact Telephone Number: 682-5241 <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />The implementation of a 3-cent-per-gallon local motor vehicle fuel tax in August 2004, together with the <br />reimbursement component of the transportation systems development charge, has allowed the City to <br />begin addressing the significant backlog of pavement preservation projects in Eugene. However, this <br />backlog continues to grow. Additional funding is needed to reverse this trend and to do the repair work <br />necessary to ensure the efficient and safe operation of local transportation systems. This work session <br />provides an opportunity for council to review the progress on preservation program funding efforts, to <br />hear updates on cooperative efforts with partner agencies, and to discuss the potential implementation of <br />additional funding options or increases in the levels of existing funding mechanisms. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Previous Council Action and History_ <br />In October 2001, the Citizen's Subcommittee on Transportation System Funding presented its <br />recommendation that the council implement a transportation funding package consisting of a <br />combination local motor vehicle fuel tax and transportation system maintenance fee for the purpose of <br />generating an additional $9 million annually to address the City's critical transportation system funding <br />needs. <br /> <br />On December 9, 2002, the council approved an ordinance establishing a transportation system <br />maintenance fee (TSMF). On January 29, 2003, a related transportation revenue measure, the local <br />motor vehicle fuel tax ("fuel tax"), was approved by the council. On September 8, 2003, the council <br />voted to repeal the TSMF ordinance, citing the recent repeal by the Springfield City Council of that <br />city's TSMF and concerns about equity between the two cities, as well as concerns raised by the Eugene <br />Chamber of Commerce about the structure and impact of the TSMF on Eugene businesses. The council <br />also cited continued hope for collaborative solutions with partner agencies, with particular reference to <br />upcoming discussions with the Lane Board of County Commissioners and other local officials around <br />the potential distribution of new street maintenance monies being made available to the County as a <br />result of recent State legislation. <br /> <br />Status of Current Funding and Project Accomplishments <br />As a result of those interagency discussions, Lane County chose not to continue at this time exploration <br />of either a county-wide motor vehicle registration fee or a county-wide motor vehicle fuel tax. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040927\S040927B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />