My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20518
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2013 No. 20504 - 20519
>
Ordinance No. 20518
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2013 11:12:20 AM
Creation date
10/31/2013 11:10:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20518
Document_Title
Toxics updates
Adopted_Date
10/28/2013
Approved Date
10/30/2013
CMO_Effective_Date
11/30/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E. MISCELLANEOUS <br />37. QUESTION: Is natural gas a reportable substance? <br />ANSWER: Natural gas is exempt from the reporting requirement. Apart from the <br />difficulties in measuring natural gas used in manufacturing processes, as opposed to non - <br />manufacturing processes in the facility, virtually all natural gas is chemically altered in <br />combustion, and the by- products are not reportable. <br />38. QUESTION: SARA Title III exempts a variety of products from reporting. 29 CFR <br />1910.1200 (b) (5) (iii) HAZCOM rules for SDSs exempts "any food, food additive, color <br />additive, cosmetic, or medical or veterinary device or product, including materials <br />intended for use as ingredients in such products (e.g. flavors and fragrances)." If I use <br />substances for which there is no SDS requirement, am I required to track and report these <br />materials? <br />ANSWER: The Toxics Board has determined that substances are reportable if the <br />manufacturer has evidence indicating that they are reportable, and are not reportable if <br />the manufacturer has no such evidence. SDSs are one, but not necessarily the only, <br />source of such evidence. Manufacturers are not required to seek such evidence beyond <br />information that is readily available to them. However, the absence of an SDS does not in <br />itself automatically exempt a substance from reportability (see Characteristic Substances <br />section on page 12 for additional information). <br />39. QUESTION: EPA has exemption rules for de minimus quantities, often established for <br />anything less than I% by weight of the total amount. Many paints, adhesives, inks, and <br />other formulations have trace amounts of listed chemicals. Can we follow current, <br />established EPA guidelines to ease the burden upon businesses in tracking quantities at <br />these de minimus levels? <br />ANSWER: No, because even concentrations of less than 1% can represent large <br />quantities of reportable chemicals if the quantity of the mixture is great enough. Aside <br />from the reporting thresholds themselves, there are de minimus exemptions only for <br />contaminants which: a) belong to a SARA 313 chemical category and represent less than <br />1 percent of the total weight of a purchased material; or b) have no CAS number listed on <br />an SDS. <br />40. QUESTION: The instructions indicate that waste aerosol cans are not reportable. Does <br />this refer to cans with contents still inside? Also, please clarify whether the contents of <br />waste aerosol cans are ever reportable in manufacturing processes. <br />ANSWER: The contents of all aerosol cans are reportable under the same conditions as <br />any other substance. The exemption refers only to the cans themselves. <br />41. QUESTION: Is ethanol produced by breweries reportable? <br />-66- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.