My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/08/04Mtg
>
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:47:57 PM
Creation date
11/4/2004 8:59:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
474
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and the policy related to not locating residences beneath high voltage power lines was in effect in <br />December 1999. He cited Laurel Hill Pan Policy #5; "No additional sector of East Laurel Hill shall be <br />designated for commercial purposes until a public need can be demonstrated." He said the neighborhood <br />association wanted the commission to interject the phrase "for more commercially designated land" in <br />the policy following the word "need" and it was the applicant's position that the policy said if there was a <br />public need for the designation of more commercial land, that new commercial land designation could <br />occur in the Laurel Hill area. He said a fundamental public need related to the site was the need to have <br />land that was developable under the land use designations associated with it. He illustrated on photo- <br />graphs the site characteristics that made residential development unfeasible, but would not impose as <br />significant constraints on commercial development and noted there had been inquiries about using the <br />property for a hotel or office building. <br /> <br />Mr. Terrell commented there were development constraints on other commercial properties in the area <br />but he had focused his efforts on issues related directly to the subject property. He said the impact of <br />Sun Blaze Village was also not addressed because it was in an appeal phase and the applicant did not <br />want to rely on that issue, but could provide additional information. He said that two traffic studies had <br />been done and the applicant realized that traffic was an issue in the area in terms of avoiding the use of <br />residential streets for commercial traffic and the cooperative agreement among the Oregon Department of <br />Transportation (ODOT) and the cities of Eugene and Springfield relating to the Glenwood interchange. <br />He referred to an email from ODOT in the materials he submitted, which indicated that none of the <br />traffic problems were insurmountable. He said the applicant wanted to clearly understand the needs of <br />the Planning Division, Public Works Department, ODOT, and the commission in order to respond. <br /> <br /> MINUTES - Eugene Planning Commission September 14, 2004 Page 5 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br /> IV-95 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.