My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/08/04Mtg
>
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:47:57 PM
Creation date
11/4/2004 8:59:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
474
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene Planning Commission <br />September 14, 2004 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> that, "Undeveloped residential land is considered unbuildable and removed from the supply if it <br /> is within 230 KV powerline easements[.]" That change in findings recognizes a new community <br /> policy of where residential development will occur within the city. <br /> <br /> Consequently, the current application addresses an amended community policy now in effect <br /> and the Planning Commission can make positive findings for criterion EC 9.8424(2). We ask the <br /> Planning Commission to do so. <br /> <br /> Laurel Itill Policy//5 <br /> <br /> Laurel Hill Plan Policy number five provides; "No additional sector of East Laurel Hill shall <br /> be designated for commercial purposes until a public need can be demonstrated." The staff <br /> report and public comments read that provision to require that all possible commercial <br /> development in the area must be completed before any public need can be demonstrated. In <br /> short, they contend that "public need" means "public need for more commercially designated <br /> land." That is not what Policy #5 expressly provides; they seek to insert words into the language <br /> of that policy where those words have been omitted. <br /> <br /> Policy #5 says that a "public need" must be demonstrated. The public need here is a very real <br /> public need. The public has a need for property to be developable under the plan and zone <br /> designations given to that property. That is the core of effective land use planning. This is not <br /> an abstract need applicable to every parcel of property within the City because nearly every other <br /> parcel in the City is developable under the plan and zone designations given to it. Here, the land <br /> use process failed and imposed designations that result in an undevelopable property. The public <br /> need to have developable property has been violated. We are seeking to correct that error. <br /> <br /> I believe you will receive testimony tonight concerning the need for motel sites visible from I- <br /> 5 and accessible to both the highway and to the City. As that testimony demonstrates, that <br /> commercial public need is unmet by other properties in the Eugene area. <br /> <br /> If these applications are approved, the site will remained severely constrained. However, the <br /> property will be able to be put to use under the new land use designations. That is currently not <br /> the case. <br /> <br /> We ask that the Planning Commission conclude that the proposal satisfies Laurel Hill Policy # <br /> 5 for the reasons provided above. <br /> <br /> Traffic Impacts <br /> <br /> While the staff report does not indicate any major traffic concerns related to the application, <br /> there is a comment submitted by ODOT that concerns traffic impacts that may arise from <br /> development of the subject property. Attached as Exhibits C and D hereto is an e-mail exchange <br /> between myself and Tom Boyatt concerning ODOT's comments that are included as part of your <br /> <br /> IV-13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.