Laserfiche WebLink
PATRICIA THOMAS <br />CITY OF EUGENE PLANNING DIVISION <br />September 21, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Another parcel is bifurcated by 25~ Street (unbuilt) and owned by a third party. The party does not <br />reside in Eugene and has been unresponsive to overtures concerning sharing in infrastructure costs. <br />The property is not listed for sale, and at this point we doubt that the owner will participate in <br />development of the property; this property will be marketed, if at all, after all infrastructure is <br />constructed without their participation. <br /> <br />2. Need for Tourist Oriented Commercial Property. As noted in prior testimony, this site is the <br />only parcel that two competing motel developers wish to consider. Due to access restrictions, slope <br />and other issues, the other parcels that are zoned commercial are not as desirable to a motel <br />developer. With the reduction of available units from the recent tear down of the Clarion Motel, the <br />lack of available commercial property at the Gateway Interchange as well as the Coburg Interchange, <br />the ever-increasing traffic on 1-5 and other factors have led to unmet demand for motel and tourist <br />services that are freeway oriented in the Eugene/Springfield area. The fulfillment of this demand <br />meets a public need. <br /> <br />3. No Precedent. The neighborhood association spokesman suggested in his oral testimony, <br />that there was the risk of setting a bad precedent by allowing this property to be zoned commercial. <br />Particularly he noted that perhaps all that was needed, was to allege that public need existed and the <br />Planning Commission would be constrained to grant any future rezoning request. <br /> <br />We believe this criticism is unwarranted because of the uniqueness of this particular site. There are <br />numerous other criteria involved in addition to public need, each of which has been met by the <br />Applicant and which other sites would have difficulty meeting. With the freeway on the north side, <br />the freeway interchange on the east side and commercial property on the south side, plus high <br />voltage transmission lines efts-crossing the property with a tower on the southwest comer, this site <br />is unique not only in the Laurel Hill neighborhood but in Lane County as well as probably the state <br />of Oregon. No other applicant will ever bring a similar application to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />4. Trade With Other Commercial Zoning. It was also suggested that perhaps the Applicant <br />should consider trading any increase in the commercial zoning that might be granted incident to this <br />application, for a downgrade to residential of other existing commercial property. To begin with it <br />is worth noting that the price that has been offered by the motel developers is less than one-half the <br />price per square foot, that would be expected for other commercial property. The reason for this <br />deep discount is the problems associated with the high voltage wires and the constraints that this <br />imposes. The fact remains, that the Subject Property has no utility as residentially zoned property; <br /> <br /> IV-52 <br /> <br /> <br />