Laserfiche WebLink
Oregon <br /> Department of Transportation <br /> Region 2 <br /> Thcx~dore R. Kulongoski, Governor 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg. B <br /> Salem, Oregon 97301-5395 <br /> 503-986-2600 <br /> October 14, 2004 FAX 50,3-986-26.30 <br /> <br /> Honorable James D. Torrey, Mayor of Eugene: <br /> FILE CODE: <br /> <br /> I am writing to follow up with you to clarify the commitment ODOT has made to <br /> consider grade separated ramp connections between the planned I-5 Willamette <br /> River Replacement Bridge and Franklin Blvd. (a.k.a. OR 99, OR 126B). As you <br /> are no doubt aware, adding ramps to I-5 at this location raises many complex <br /> transportation system issues. Examples of such complex issues include <br /> n ighborhood and parkland impacts, proximity of adjacent existing interchanges, <br /> and access management on Franklin Blvd. <br /> <br /> ODOT firmly believes that we must resolve the transportation systems planning <br /> issues before we can address the proposed ramp connections through the NEPA <br /> process. ODOT has learned the hard way that the NEPA process can be an <br /> expensive and time-consuming substitute for a logical systems planning effort. <br /> Put another way, NEPA consideration of design alternatives is a much more <br /> effective process where the local system planning has been completed prior to <br /> engaging the environmental work. <br /> <br /> I want to reinforce the Department's commitment to evaluating ramp connection <br /> options; however, I believe that it is important for me to clarify ODOT's two-phase <br /> planning process. The first phase is a systems planning effort that identifies the <br /> problem to be solved, the value in addressing the problem, and identification of a <br /> feasible range of solutions. The outcome of this system planning phase would <br /> be adoption of an improvement concept and policies that support the <br /> improvement concept in the local Transportation System Plans (TSPs) and the <br /> Metropolitan Planning Organization's federally mandated Regional <br /> Transportation Plan (RTP). It will also be necessary to amend the RTP Financial <br /> Constraint project list to include the concept and cost. <br /> <br /> Once this system planning work is completed and adopted into the local TSP, <br /> thereby demonstrating local support, the improvement concept could then move <br /> into the project planning and development phase. This phase will likely involve <br /> developing a federally approved environmental document that addresses the <br /> adopted improvement concept, with the goal of selecting a preferred alternative <br /> that enjoys combined local, state and federal support. <br /> <br />Form 734-'1867A (5-04) <br /> <br /> <br />