My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/22/04Mtg
>
Item 2A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:23:55 PM
Creation date
11/17/2004 12:17:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
George Kjaer, 814 Lorane Highway, likened the meetings with the Planning and Development <br /> Department (PDD) staff with being sold a roof. He said the salesperson knew he needed a roof, but would <br /> not tell him how much it would cost nor what color it would be. He advocated for having all the design <br /> elements in place and codified, including the designation of context-sensitive design as well as the local <br /> street designation to provide a real choice. <br /> <br /> Donna Hawley, 3484 Storey Boulevard, said she was speaking on behalf of her daughter, Sheri Hawley, <br /> who was unable to attend. She shared that the "long struggle" affected the families and friends of the <br /> residents of the neighborhood. She reiterated that the neighbors wanted the beauty of the neighborhood to <br /> be preserved. She related that she had worked in the City of Salem as a neighborhood counselor, helping <br /> neighbors understand how to work with the City to achieve their goals. She understood the frustration of <br /> people who were confronted with City plans that were supposed to be for their own good. She opined that <br /> eventually the City had to pay attention to what the neighbors want and need rather than what "looked <br /> good on a piece of paper." She urged the council to keep the street designation "local." <br /> <br />Stanley D. Kluth, 2830 Friendly Street, shared that he worked for the Army and the Department of <br />Defense. He commented that the people should drive the plan and not the other way around. He related <br />that he had lived in several cities in Germany. He said they had started to mn traffic collectors through <br />residential neighborhoods and had determined that it did not work. He stated that the cities had pulled the <br />traffic back out of the neighborhoods by placing traffic calming devices and reducing the speed limit to 30 <br />kilometers per hour. He stressed that residential neighborhoods were not for traffic. <br /> <br />Virginia Starling, 3302 Storey Boulevard, asked how the neighborhood could give City staff "carte <br />blanche" to design the area when they had not shown the neighbors any of the ideas that were being <br />considered. She noted that staff had collected a variety of ideas from the neighbors, but there was no <br />indication of the planning that City staff had undertaken. She asserted that senior transportation analyst <br />for the Public Works Department, Gary McNeel, had contradicted himself regarding sidewalk <br />requirements, which added to neighborhood mistrust. She said there were discrepancies in the <br />information provided the neighborhood regarding tree removal as well. <br /> <br />Clyde R. Nielson, 3441 Storey Boulevard, urged the City to cooperate with the neighborhood regarding <br />designation and potential street improvements. He supported Option 2 and thought this was the solution <br />the neighborhood would be willing to work with. He was troubled, however, by the meaning of "context- <br />sensitive design." He thought sensitive to be a nebulous word, subject to individual interpretation. He <br />commented that the word "context" in this case referred to the physical surroundings of the traffic. He <br />opined that it should also include the people. He averred that neighborhood sentiments about what Was <br />being planned should be an essential part of the equation. He thought that a determination of how design <br />decisions should be made and who shared in the final say should be folded into the term "context sensitive <br />design." He felt that citizen involvement would otherwise be a sham. <br /> <br />In closing, Mr. Nielson thanked the City because the push for collector status for the neighborhood streets <br />had given birth to solidarity. <br /> <br />Paul Thompson, 2970 Charnelton Street, speaking as chair of the Crest Drive Neighborhood Association, <br />conveyed the opposition of the association, as per the vote in the previous spring. He reminded the <br />council that one year ago the neighborhood association had voted to formally and unanimously endorse <br />the inclusion of context-sensitive design in the arterial/collector street plan. He observed that the work <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 25, 2004 Page 6 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.