Laserfiche WebLink
win-win situation. He thought more time was necessary for the City to build relationships with all of the <br />people in the neighborhood so that they could be included in the process. He felt the design charrette held <br />by the City was just the start. He suggested linking the street designation, either by ordinance or by <br />council motion, to the design process. He also recommended adoption of the Crest Drive Neighborhood <br />Association recommendation, encapsulated in Option 2. He was concerned that approval of the <br />designation as arterial collectors would alienate all of the residents of the area. <br /> <br />Susan Jason, 310 Crest Drive, related that her home had suffered a devastating house fire on September <br />16. She said no one was home at the time and quick-thinking neighbors had been able to let their dogs <br />loose. She noted they ran into the street and were not hit by cars and attributed this to the street not being <br />a collector, She stated that the damage was not as severe as it could have been because the Eugene Fire <br />Department responded quickly, something she also conjectured could have been delayed had the road <br />been redesignated a collector. She averred the potholes could be fixed without changing the road. <br /> <br />Len Bailey, 2932 Friendly Street, called the neighborhood unique in its collection of winding roads, <br />wildlife, and tall fir trees and "country lane feel." He thought this neighborhood caused City planners and <br />traffic engineers to "virtually drool at the possibilities to make the neighborhood into some grand, <br />'eugeneric,' super-efficient, over-engineered system." He averred that building wider streets would bring <br />more traffic. He reiterated the neighborhood's desire to calm the existing traffic and to avoid increasing <br />it. He asked the council to cherish the neighborhood as those who resided there did. <br /> <br />Donna Riddle, 1238 Crest Drive, said she lived on her five-acre parcel for 34 years. She related that the <br />County had turned over maintenance of Crest Drive to the City approximately 15 years ago. She alleged <br />that it had not been maintained since then. She noted she nearly fell in a pothole earlier in the day. She <br />agreed with comments that suggested that the change in traffic lights at Willamette Street had increased <br />traffic. <br /> <br />James Reed, 990 Crest Drive, stated that the Public Works Department staff had assured the <br />neighborhood that the same physical design would be implemented irrespective of the classification. With <br />that in mind, he suggested a local designation would not interfere with the City's goals of connectivity. <br />He felt that the risk with the collector designation was that the codified standards for neighborhood <br />collectors were far in excess of what would be deemed acceptable. He noted that context-sensitive design <br />had yet to be codified. He opined that the risks to livability far outweighed the benefits of connectivity <br />that a collector would afford the neighborhood. Regarding current traffic, he agreed that more stop signs <br />and traffic calming were needed. He likened using evidence that traffic existed on the roads already as <br />justification for redesignation to deciding that, because people were throwing garbage in their yard that it <br />would be a good place for a garbage dump. <br /> <br />Robbin Howard, 3217 Whitten Drive, said she walked on the streets with her seven-year-old daughter <br />and they loved their walks in the neighborhood. She commented that the City offered incentives to <br />businesses to move to the City, but the other reason businesses located here was the livability the City had <br />to offer. She asserted that designation as a collector could cause trees to be cut down, roads to be <br />widened, and a reduction in the livability of the neighborhood. She thought everyone should think of <br />themselves as public servants and should serve the public. She felt being attached to one wrong idea did <br />not serve the public. She said she was honored by her neighbors' cooperation to work toward a common <br />good. She supported Option 2. She noted that she had spoken to neighbors that, while opposed to <br />redesignating the street, wanted the safety improved. She supported such improvements. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 25, 2004 Page 9 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />