Laserfiche WebLink
""' ? November '8, 2004 <br />Mr. Jerome Lidz ~ i -4- <br /> <br />City clari~y thatthe term "existing" in its wireless code includes new facilities or poles <br />Constructed to replace a pre-existing facility Or F;ole in order to accommodate the addition of a <br />wire]ess facility. -,cee, e.g., EC 9.5750(3)(a). This is important because o~en existing light poles <br />and utility poles are not structurally strong enough to accommodate the addition of a wireless <br />~acility. Consequently, to locate on a light pole or utility p01e, a wireless carrier must replace <br />tine exisl~ng pole with a new pole to meet height and structural safety requirements. If <br /> necessary, A3-FWS could produce language to assist the City with this amendment. .. <br /> <br /> Thane you very much for your consideration. We remain hopeful that the City will revise <br /> its approach to amending its wireless code so t{~at ATTWS and other carriers will be able to <br /> meet the service demand~ of their customers living in and traveling through Eugene. Please <br /> contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. <br /> <br /> Ve~ truly yours, <br /> <br /> Molly A. Lawrence <br /> <br /> MAL:MAL <br /> Dan Smith, A1-FWS <br /> Ron Fowler <br /> Louis Levy, ATTWS <br /> <br /> y:~WP'd~Ti~ENILr~ND COMMENT LTR 110B04.DOC <br /> <br /> 11/08/04 M0N 10:43 [TX/RX NO 8271] <br /> <br /> <br />