Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Poling commented, regarding the third proposed amendment, that he would not tolerate any interfer- · ' <br /> ence with public safety employees' radios. He hoped that the legal challenges that had been raised would <br /> become clearer in time. He. thanked the CRPCPT for its information. <br /> <br /> MI. Kelly voiced his support for the main motion. He recalled that in his ward several cell tower <br /> placements had generated well over 100 citizen Comments. He thought zoning did not adequately <br /> influence cell tower siting as it was possible to live on land that was zoned R-1 that was immediately <br /> adjacent to land that was zoned I on which a cell tower could more easily be placed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner recalled the amount of stafftime and outside legal counsel required in the development of the <br /> Telecommunications Ordinance and expressed hope 'that the City could approach cell tower citing much <br /> more efficiently. <br /> <br /> Mr. Taylor noted that the mobile data terminals in police cars ran on cell tower technology. <br /> <br /> MS. Bettman supported the motion. <br /> <br /> The main motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> The meeting adjoUrned at 1:24 p.m. <br /> <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> Dennis Mi Taylor <br /> City .Manager <br /> <br />· (Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 14, 2004 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> IV-6 <br /> <br /> <br />