Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Eugene Code ' '~'~'i this section, or designs showing how the sound is to be effectively muffled and reduced pursuant to those standards. 6. A landscape plan drawn to scale showing proposed and existing landscaping, including type, spacing, size and irrigation methods. 7. Plans showing the connection to utilities/right-of-way cuts required, ownership of utilities and easements required. 8. Documents demonstrating that necessary easements have been obtained; '9. Plans showing how vehiCle access will be provided; 10. Signature of the property owner(s) on the aPplication form or a statement from the property owner(s) granting authorization to proceedwith development permit and land use processes; 11. Documents demonstrating that the FAA has reviewed and approved the proposal, and Oregon Aeronautics Division has reviewed the proposal. Alternatively, when a site review or conditional use process is required, submit a statement documenting that notice of the proposal has been submitted to the FAA and Oregon Aeronautics Division. The site review or conditional use process may proceed and approval may be granted for the proposal as submitted, subject to FAA approval. If FAA approval requires any changes to the proposal as initially approved, .then that initial approval shall be void. A new .... application will 'need to be submitted, reviewed and approved .... through an additional site review or conditional use process. No . '~ '~ development permit application shall be submitted without documents demonStrating FAA review and approval and Oregon " Aeronautics Division review. (c) Site Review and Conditional Use Permit Applications. In addition to the apPlication requirements specified in paragraph' (b) above, applications for site review or conditional use permits also shall include the following information: 1. A visual studY containing, at a m!nimum, a graphic simulation showing the appearance of the proposed tower, antennas, and. ancillary facilities.from at least 5 points within a 3 mile radius. Such points shall be chosen by the provider with review and approval by the planning director to ensure that various potential views are represented. 2. Documentation that alternative sites within a radius of at least 2000 feet have been-Considered and have been determined to be technologically unfeasible or unavailable. For site reviews, alternative sites zoned C-4, I-1, I-2, and I-3 must be considered. For conditional use permits alternative sites' zoned PL, C-2 and C- 3,. C-41 I-1, I-2, and I-3 must be considered. X '3. Evidence demonstrating Collocation is.impractical on 'existing tall buildings, light or utility poles, water towers, existing transmission towers, and existing tower facility sites for reasons of structural support capabilities, safety, available space, or failing to meet service coverage area needs. " ' 4. A current overall system plan for the cityl showing facilities '- ,.. presently constructed or approved and future expansion plans. 9-235 01/02/2004 IV-13