Laserfiche WebLink
'Lq 1997 Eugene adopted Our telecommunication devised siting requirements and. <br />procedures Section of our code, section 9.5750. The purposes of that.code were to: <br /> <br /> 1. minimize the number of towers throughout our community <br /> 2. encourage collocation of facilities <br /> ' 3.. encourage the use of existing buildings, or poles as opposed to constmctihg new <br /> towers <br /> 4. 'recognize the need of providers to build out their systems & <br /> 5. ensure that facilities are designed to minimize the visual impact On the immediate <br /> surroUndings & throughout the community, minimize public inconvenience & <br /> disruption. <br /> <br /> Go through numbers on chart. <br /> <br /> The code attempts to promote collocation by streamlining the process by allowing <br /> outright, antenna collocations in most zones and by putting restrictions and limitations on <br /> collocations in some of our more sensitive zones. ,- <br /> <br /> Regarding new towers~ our cOde all ws them outri dustrial and our <br /> commercial/industrial hybrid zone, C-4. Our code requires site review, a slightly more <br /> complicated process i~ Y~u're ih a public lands zone or some of our other commercial <br /> zones, and if the proposal is in our more sensitive single family, commercial and general <br /> office zOnes, a conditional use permit is required. <br /> <br /> New transmission towers are prohibited by our code in Agriculture, R-2, R-3, R-4, <br /> Historic, Natural Resource and Parks, Recreation & Open zones, in the Willamette <br /> Greenway, on Gillespie Butte above 450' in elevation, on the ridgeline defined in the <br /> south hills study or on Judldns point. <br /> <br /> Our code currently outlines submittal requirements for new towers and includes a <br /> requirement that documentation demonstrating compliance with non-ionizing <br /> electromagnetic radiation (NIER) emissions standards as set forth by the Federal <br /> CommUnications Commission. If a proposal is kicked into a site review or conditional <br /> use situation, if it's in one of those situations I described earlier, documentation also must <br /> -be submitted showing that alternative sites within 2000 feet have been considered and are <br /> determined to by unfeasible or unavailable, code asks applicants to consider sites that are <br /> in some of the less sensitive zones (industrial and heavy commercial). Also required is <br /> evidence that demonstrates it is impractical to collocate on tall buildings, light poles or <br /> eXisting towers and it outlines reasons that are acceptable about why it would be <br /> infeasible. <br /> <br /> New towers have to be at least 2000 feet away from towers that existed prior to adoption <br /> of the code in 1997. <br /> <br /> IV-19 <br /> <br /> <br />