My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/22/04Mtg
>
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:42:10 PM
Creation date
11/17/2004 12:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Planning Director's denial to the Hearings Official who upheld the denial. The applicant did not <br /> appeal to LUBA. <br /> <br /> Masters Towers LLC (SR 01-33) was an application for a 100-foot tall flagpole-type tower to be located <br /> at,103 Oakleigh Lane (just Off of River Road) on property zoned C-2 Community Commercial. The' <br /> facility was originally proposed to include an American flag at the top in order to make it appear as a <br /> flag pole and thus further minimize its visual appearance as a telecommunication facility. That feature <br /> was removed in response to neighborhood objections to the flag. The antennas on the proposed Pole will' <br /> be enclosed within the pole. Surrounding properties .are all commercially zoned, with residential uses <br /> located fiu'ther east and west of the River Road commercial strip. The Planning Director approved the <br /> application, which was appealed by neighbors to the Hearings Official who upheld the approval. That <br /> decision was appealed to LUBA by a neighbor.' LUBA afl'rimed the decision of the Hearings Official. <br /> That decision was then appealed to the Court of Appeals where it is CUrrently pending. <br /> <br /> Finally, in the December 13, 2001 update memo it was noted that Lane County was.in the process of <br />'. adopting specific requirements for teleCOmmunications facilities. 'Lane County adopted amendments in <br /> April of 2002. Although Lane County and Eugene's ordinances contain similar components, Lane County <br /> has structured its to address rural situations. Lane County did adopt Eugene's telecommunications <br /> ordinance for the Urban Transition area (the area outside the City limits but within the Urban Growth <br />Bouna ). <br /> <br />There are no timing requirements related to this item/ ~7~ <br />ovTio s .g <br />The council has requested an opportunity to discuss this item. .do~,c~ <br /> <br />STArV <br />Staffrequests City Council direction on this item. /.4 <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION ~ <br />None. <br /> <br />A rxcmv s <br />A. Memorandum dated December 1~ 2001 <br />B. List of Telecommunication Facility Locations <br />C. Copy of Eugene Code Section 9.5750 <br /> <br />I~R MORE INFORMATION 3~ <br />St~'Contac~: Serry Jacob~on ' J ~av'~ . <br />Telephone: 682-5896 <br />StaffB-Mail: j 'y.p.j acobson®ci.eugene.or, us <br /> <br /> P:\CMO~2002 Counoil Ag~ndash'VI021014k~021014C.wpd <br /> Eugene City Council Agenda page19 <br /> IV-28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.