Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,' -~' " 91 P!ans showinghow vchi~e access will be provided; .'. i ) 10; S~gnatu~e of the property owner(s) on the applicatiOn form or a " statement from the property owner(s) granting authorization to · ,proceed with'development permit and land use processes; 11; Documents demonstrating that the FAA has reviewed and approved the proposal, and Oregon Aeronautics Division has reviewed the proposal. Alternatively, when a site review or conditional use process is required, submit a statement dOcumenting that notice of the proposal has been submitted to the FAA and0regon Aeronautics DiVision. The site review or conditional use process may proceed and approval may be ~ranted for. the proposal as submitted, subject to FAA approval. IfFKA approval requires, any changes to the proposal as initially approved, thenthat initial approval shall be void. 'A new application will · need to be submitted, reviewed and approved through an additional · site review or Conditional use process.. No development permit application shall be submitted without documents demonstrating · FAA review and approval and Oregon Aeronautics Division .....(c) '..Site Review and Conditional Use permit Applicati0n.~. In addition to the appliCation requirements specified in parat~ph Co) above, applications for " '~ site review or.conditional use permits also shall include the following .." information: 1. A visual study eontaining,.ata minimum, a graphic simulation · ' showing the. appearance of the proposed tower, antennas, and ancillary facilities from at least 5 points withi~ a 3 mile radius. Such points'shall be chosen by the provider with review and approval by the planning director to ensure that various potential .views are represented. 2. Documentation that alternative sites within a radius of at least 2000 feet have been considered and have been d~termined to be technologically unfeasible or unavailable. For site reviews, alternadve sites zoned C4, I-l, I-2, and I-3 must be considered. 'For conditional use permits alternative sites zoned PL, C-2 and C- 3, C4, I-l, I-2, and I-3 must be considered. ~3. Evidence demonstrating cellocation is impractical, on existing tall buildings, light or utility poles, water towers, existing transmission towers, and existing tower facility sit~s for reasons of structural ~upport capabilities, safety, available space, or failing to meet service coverage area n~l~. '. · .. 4. A eur~nt overall system plan for the city, showing facilities presently constructed or approved and future expansion plans. , 5. A stat~nent providing the reasons for the location, design and ~ . height of the proposed tower or antennas. Eugene City Council Agenda page31