Laserfiche WebLink
from setting up regulations that preserve property values, or protect a~ainst <br /> attractive nuisance. A strong setback requirement is the backbone of the. <br /> ordinance. This variance proposal as written weakens the whole ordinance, gives <br /> the upper hand to industry, and leaves homeowners without recourse. I do not <br /> understand the rationale for spending City funds to amend the ordinance if the <br /> changes will result in a loophole of this nature. <br /> <br /> On the other hand, the amendment to section (11) has my heartiest approval. <br /> Independent technical reviewis much needed, and will relieve Planning staff of a <br /> task for which they are not qualified. <br /> <br /> I appreciate the'opPortunity to comment on these proposed changes to the <br /> ordinance, and I would love to see the language that is submitted to the Planning <br /> Commission. <br /> <br />· Kind Regards, <br /> <br /> Eugene OR 97404 <br /> <br /> IV-55 <br /> <br /> <br />