My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/22/04Mtg
>
Item 3 - PH/Ord. on Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:42:10 PM
Creation date
11/17/2004 12:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> <br /> EC 9.5750(5) Construction of Transmission Tower. <br /> The current system is a tiered approach, based on zoning of the proposed site. <br /> Current code allows construction of new towers as an Outright permitted use in the' <br /> C-4, I-1, I-2, and I-3 zones. We propose that even in the C-4, I-1, I-2, and I-3 z°nes, <br /> construction of new towers should be subject to a site review approval process. <br /> This will ensure compliance with all provisions of this code, particularly an <br /> independent technical review of RF aspects of the application. Zones in which <br /> towers are currently prohibited are AG, R-2, R-3, R-4, H, NR, and PRO. We propose <br /> that R-1 and RA should be added to this list, since the vast majority of residential <br /> neighborhoods in the Eugene area are either R-1 or RA. RA must be added because <br /> the Lane County Board of Commissioners recently adopted EC 9.5750 to apply on <br /> county lands within the Urban Growth Boundary, and most of the residential <br /> neighborhoods outside city limits and inside the UGB are zo'ned RA. Applications <br /> for towers in C-2 zoning should be subject to a Conditional Use Permit, rather than <br /> the current Site Site Review process; because there are a significant number of <br /> neighborhoods in which C-2 zoning is adjacent to residential zoning and/or use. <br /> Conditional use permits should be required in PL, C-2, C-3, S, and GO. <br /> <br /> EC 9.5750(6) Application Requirements. <br /> (a) Collocation of antennas. <br />EC 9.5750(6)(a)1. Current code requires the applicant to give 'A description of <br />proposed antennas' location, design, and height." The application requirements <br />should also include engineering specifics such as effective radiated power (ERP), <br />mounting angle of proposed antennas, and if antennas are to be placed on a <br />rooftop, documentation by an independent RF engineer that the ERP will not be in <br />· excess of FCC standards for rooftop installations.. <br /> <br />For example, in February of 2002, we contacted the City of Eugene about an <br />antenna array placed on the Bedac Building (EUG 0243) across from the then <br />operational Santa Clara Elementary School. There are 16 antennas on the rooftop, <br />and the newest six have an ERP of 1805 watts each. This newest installation puts <br />the cumulative ERP at the Berjac Building in excess of the total 2000 watts FCC <br />allows for rooftop installations. In response to our concern, Mr. McKerrow stated: <br /> <br />"According to the City's telecommunication ordinance an applicant <br />wishing to install telecommunication devices must meet all of the <br />application requirements. One of the requirements Js documentation that <br />shows the proposed equipment will meet FCC standards for electromagnetic <br />radiation. The application for this permit included a report from a <br />radio frequency engineer indicating FCC-approved equipment will be used <br />and FCC guidelines met. The requirements of Eugene Code Section <br />9.5750(6) were satisfied and the permit was approved." <br /> <br /> IV-75 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.