Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit B <br /> Implementation Strategy 17.1: Within the area from the east <br />side of Agripac to Washington Street, change the plan designation and <br />zoning of land currently zoned for industrial use to encourage a mixture <br />of residential, commercial, and compatible industrial use.” (pg. III-15) <br />Although only the CLS policies were formally adopted by the City Council, the <br />above implementation strategy is indicative of the Council’s intent, which is <br />consistent with the Applicant’s proposal to match plan/zoning designations and long- <br />time commercial use as a means to ensure continued commercial use of this <br />downtown property. <br /> Industrial Lands Special Study <br /> City staff confirmed that although the subject site has Industrial zoning, the <br />Metropolitan Industrial Land Special Study only included vacant land either zoned or <br />designated Industrial as of 1989. The study’s map for Subregion #4 (Central <br />University) depicted only two sites in the downtown area – both parking lots located <br />on the north side of the railroad track. <br />Therefore, the inventory of Industrial lands required to meet the community’s <br />needs did not include the subject site, and approving the requested redesignation and <br />rezoning will not affect the City’s ability to comply with Goal 9 in terms of needed <br />Industrial lands. <br /> Eugene Comprehensive Land Assessment <br /> As part of the City of Eugene’s process to establish its own Urban Growth <br />Boundary separate from Springfield (per HB 3337), the City analyzed the sufficiency of <br />residential, commercial and industrial land within the existing UGB. The subject site <br />was not included in the Eugene Comprehensive Land Assessment (ECLA) among vacant <br />sites evaluated for industrial use (consistent with its zoning), residential use <br />(consistent with its designation), or commercial use (consistent with its existing and <br />long-standing commercial use) because the site was not vacant and too small to be <br />considered as a significant redevelopment site. <br /> ECLA did identify a deficit of 118 acres and 361 sites of land currently <br />designated Commercial that area less than 5 acres in size, and a surplus of both acres <br />and sites of Industrially designated land less than 5 acres in size (Table 3, pg. 13). <br />This indicates that redesignating the subject property would not hinder the City’s <br />ability to provide needed Industrial land, but would be consistent with meeting <br />Eugene’s projected need for small Commercially designated sites. <br /> The ECLA showed a deficit of 94 acres of High Density Residential designated <br />land, but a larger deficit of 388 acres of Commercial designated land (Table S-1, pg. <br />1). City staff confirmed that the site was not included in the Eugene-Springfield <br />Metropolitan Area Residential Lands and Housing study inventory of residential lands, <br />nor in the ECLA inventory of commercial and residential lands. <br />Therefore, approval of the requested redesignation would support the City’s <br />efforts to meet needed commercial lands, but would not debit from its inventory of <br />needed industrial or residential lands, or affect the City’s consistency with Goal 9. <br />