My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20545
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2014 No. 20520 - 20547
>
Ordinance No. 20545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2014 12:51:07 PM
Creation date
11/26/2014 12:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20545
Document_Title
Ordinance Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metroplitan Area General Plan
Adopted_Date
11/24/2014
Approved Date
11/25/2014
Signer
Piercy
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft 9/29/14 <br />on a case-by-case basis through interpretation of the Metro PlanPlan Boundaries Map in this <br />Metro Planand the following factors (see Metro Plan Plan Boundaries Map Key): <br />Protection of Agricultural Lands <br />Protection of Forest Lands <br />Ridgeline (Drainage Basin) <br />Orderly and Economic Public Services <br />Floodway Fringe <br />Protection of Wetlands <br />Protection of Sand and Gravel Resources <br />Airport Protection <br />Existing Development and Services (City Limits) <br />Meet Economic Goals <br />Meet Housing Goals <br />Metro Plan Plan Boundary <br />The Metro Plan Plan Boundary (Plan Boundary) defines that area shown on theMetro Plan <br />Diagram that includes Springfield, Eugene, and unincorporated urban, urbanizable, rural, and <br />agricultural lands exclusive of areas encompassed in the Lane County Rural Comprehensive <br />Plan. With modification to the boundary of the adjacent Lane County Rural Comprehensive <br />Plan, tThe Plan Boundary will representsthe interface between the area encompassed in the <br />Metro Plan and areas subject to the Lane County Rural Comprehensive Plan. At some future <br />date, these boundaries may require further adjustment, reflecting increasing need for urban land <br />in the metropolitan area. The county and the two cities should recognize this possibility in their <br />respective planning programs. <br />II-G-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.