Resolution No. 5113 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

)\LMFMX' 4EKISJ Planning Director’s Recommendations and Findings: Lathen Trust (A 14-3) Application Submitted: May 27, 2014 Applicant:Jane J. Daniels Lathen Trust Map/Lot(s): 17-03-08-00: 7600, 7601, 7602 and 17-03-08-31: 1500 Zoning:AG/ULAgricultural with Urbanizable Land overlay Location: 3825 Gilham Road Representative: Anthony Favreau, The Favreau Group Lead City Staff:Becky Taylor, Associate Planner, (541) 682-5437 EVALUATION: Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies with Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation -Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and approval in accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through 9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and conclusions following each. EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city’s urban growth boundary and is: (a) Contiguous to the city limits; or (b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other body of water. Findings: The area to be annexed includes four tax lots totally 10.15 acres. The Complies annexation area is within the City's urban growth boundary (UGB), which abuts the east boundary, and the eastern portion of the north boundary, of the subject property. YES NO The Metro Plan states: “The UGB is tax lot-specific where it is coterminous with city limits, where it has been determined through the annexation process, and where it falls on the outside edge of existing or planned rights-of-way. In other places, the UGB is determined on a case-by-case basis through interpretation of the Metro PlanPlan Boundaries Map…” (Metro Plan, page II-G-14). The north and east boundaries of the UGB have not been determined previously, but will be coterminous with city limits upon annexation of the subject request. Based on the provisions above, this annexation will establish the UGB boundary for that portion of property which is coterminous with the UGB, as shown and described on Exhibits A and B. The area of request is also contiguous to city limits, which abuts the south boundary of the subject property. EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable refinement plans. Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plangenerally support this annexation by Complies encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service provisions within the UGB, including the following: YES NO Lathen Trust (A 14-3) July 30, 2014 Page 1