Laserfiche WebLink
forest tracts of private land that may be owned by forest industries or by other private <br />owners. By definition, wildland fires generally involve few or no structures. Fires that <br />involve a mixture of vegetation and structures are considered wildland/urban interface <br />fires and are discussed below in Section 9.1.3. <br /> <br />Fire suppression strategy for wildland fires is significantly different than for structure <br />fires. For wildland fires, the most common suppression strategy is to contain the fire at <br />its boundaries, to stop the spread of the fire and then to let the fire burn itself out. Fire <br />containment typically relies heavily on natural or human-made fire breaks. Water and <br />chemical fire suppressants are used primarily to help make or defend a fire break, <br />rather than to put out an entire fire, as would be the case with a structure fire. <br /> <br />Fires that are purely wildland fires, without threatening structures, nevertheless cause <br />environmental and ecological damage. Wildland fires kill wildlife and damage habitat. <br />Areas that have burned are also subject to erosion and landslides due to loss of <br />ground cover. Such fires also may result in large fire suppression costs, with a <br />potential for casualties among firefighting personnel. Historically, fire suppression <br />strategy for wildland fires has generally been to try to minimize the acreage burned in <br />each wildland fire, by applying the maximum available fire suppression resources and <br />trying to contain each fire as quickly as possible. <br /> <br />In recent years, however, fire suppression strategy for wildland fires has evolved <br />substantially in two important aspects. First, to a greater extent than previously, <br />wildland fires are being recognized as part of the natural ecology and natural life cycles <br />of wildlands. Fires create open spaces with different habitats for both plants and <br />animals than existed previously. Second, the emphasis on maximum suppression of <br />wildland fires has resulted in many fires being smaller than would naturally occur. <br />Because of the reduction in frequent, smaller fires, many wildland areas have <br />developed extraordinarily high fuel loads. Thus, the potential for very large, <br />catastrophic wildland fires may actually be increased by the effective suppression of <br />smaller fires. In recent years, evolving strategies for dealing with wildland fires have <br />focused more attention on fuel management. Strategies include more controlled burns <br />and greater tolerance for allowing smaller fires to burn, with the objective of reducing <br />fuel loads of smaller vegetation and thus reducing the potential for target fires. <br /> <br /> Wildfires may be started by natural causes, such as lightning strikes, or by human <br /> activity. US Forest Service data indicate that about 13% of wildfires are started by <br /> lightning, about 25% of wildfires are arson, while the rest are due to a variety of human <br /> causes including debris burns, discarded smoking materials, sparks from vehicles, <br /> sparks from power lines and so on. <br /> <br /> Wildfire hazard depends on three main factors: vegetative fuel load, weather, and <br /> topography. <br /> <br /> There are several parameters that define the fire potential of vegetation. Vegetative <br /> fuel loads are typically expressed as tons per acre. The greater the amount of fuel <br /> loading the greater the amount of energy that will be released in a fire. Vegetative <br /> fuels are also classified by burn index, which is a measure of the amount of energy per <br /> pound of fuel. Fuels may also be classified by potential duration of burning. For <br /> example, wildfires fueled by grass may spread very quickly, but grass contains <br /> Public Review Draft: August 6, 2004 <br /> 9-6 <br /> <br /> <br />