My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4814
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:33 PM
Creation date
11/19/2004 10:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
11/8/2004
Document_Number
4814
CMO_Effective_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 9~6 <br /> Eugene Fire Data <br /> <br /> Brush, Grass, Wild,ands~ Outside of Structures2 <br /> Year Fires Damage Fires Damage <br /> 1997 119 $9,213 41 $10,868 <br /> 1998 118 $6,363 64 $92,096 <br /> 1999 138 $1,620 50 $41,375 <br /> 2000 130 $1,764 47 $51,885 <br /> 2001 109 $2,651 46 $18,575 <br /> 2002 134 $3,277 72 $50,225 <br /> 2003 141 $8,700 40 $43,730 <br /> Average 127 $4,798 51 $44,108 <br /> Excludes crops and timber. <br /> <br /> Excludes vehicles, includes outside storage, crops and timber. The vast <br /> majority of these fires are outside storage, rather than crops or timber. <br /> <br />Ideally, historical fire data should suffice to estimate the annual probably for fires in the <br />wildland/urban interface areas of Lane County. However, current data do not appear <br />adequate to make credible calculations because the data for local, state, and federal <br />responsibility areas are not commensurate and are not sortable by type of location <br />(wildland, interface, developed areas). Nevertheless, the data reviewed above provide <br />a general picture of the level of wildland/urban interface fire risk for Lane County <br />overall. For the Eugene/Springfieid Metro Area in particular, the Lane County data <br />provide a reasonable measure of long-term overall hazard level for wildland/urban <br />interface fires. <br /> <br />However, there are several reasons why the fire risk may be higher than suggested <br />above, especially in developing wildland/urban interface areas. <br /> <br /> 1) Large fires may occur' infrequently, but statistically they will occur. One large <br /> fire could significantly change the statistics. In other words, 30 years of <br /> historical data may be too short to capture large, infrequent wildland fire events. <br /> A seismic analogy is the Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake discussed in <br /> Chapter 10. This event has not occurred in the past 30 years and probably has <br /> not occurred since 1700. Nevertheless, large earthquakes have occurred in the <br /> past and are likely in the future. Thus, a 30-year record does not completely <br /> reflect the hazard from large earthquakes or large wildland fires. <br /> <br /> 2) The level of fire hazard depends profoundly on weather patterns. A several <br /> year drought period would substantially increase the probability of large wildland <br /> fires in Lane County. For smaller vegetation areas, with grass, brush and small <br /> trees, a much shorter drought period of a few months or less would <br /> substantially increase the fire hazard. <br /> <br /> 3) The level of fire hazard in wildland/urban interface areas, with the greatest <br /> risk for life safety and property, is likely significantly higher than for wildland <br /> areas as a whole. The probability of fires starting in interface areas is much <br /> higher than in wildland areas because of the much higher population density in <br />Public Review Draft: August 6, 2004 <br /> 9-16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.