My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4814
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:33 PM
Creation date
11/19/2004 10:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
11/8/2004
Document_Number
4814
CMO_Effective_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thus, for a given site, a smaller earthquake (such as a M6.5) which is very close to the <br />site could cause greater damage than a much larger earthquake (such as a M8) which <br />is quite far away from the particular site. <br /> <br />However, earthquakes at or below M5 are not likely to cause significant damage, even <br />locally very near the epicenter. Earthquakes between about M5 and M6 are ~ikely to <br />cause some damage very near the epicenter, with the extent of damage typically being <br />relatively minor (e.g., the 1993 Scotts Mills earthquake). Earthquakes of about M6.5 or <br />greater can cause major damage (e.g., the Northddge earthquake), with damage <br />usually concentrated fairly near the epicenter. Larger earthquakes of M7+ cause <br />damage over increasingly wider geographic areas with the potential for very high levels <br />of damage near the epicenter. Great earthquakes with MS+ can cause major damage <br />over wide geographic areas. For example, a M8+ on the Cascadia Subduction Zone <br />could affect the entire Pacific Northwest from British Columbia, through Washington <br />and Oregon, and as far south as Northern California. <br /> <br />The intensity of ground shaking varies not only as a function of M and distance but also <br />depends on soil types. Soft soils may amplify ground motions and increase the level of <br />damage. Thus, for any given earthquake there will be contours of varying intensity of <br />ground shaking. The intensity will generally decrease with distance from the <br />earthquake, but often in an irregular pattern, reflecting soil conditions (amplification) <br />and possible directionality in the dispersion of earthquake energy. <br /> <br />There are many measures of the severity or intensity of earthquake ground motions. A <br />very old, but commonly used, scale is the Modified Mercalli Intensity sca~e (MMI), <br />which is a descriptive, qualitative scale that relates severity of ground motions to types <br />of damage experienced. MMls range from I to XlI. <br /> <br /> More useful, modern intensity scales use terms that can be physically measured with <br /> seismometers, such as the acceleration, velocity, or displacement (movement) of the <br /> ground. The most common physical measure, and the one used in the Mitigation Plan <br /> and in the Technical Appendix, is Peak Ground Acceleration or PGA. PGA is a <br /> measure of the intensity of shaking, relative to the acceleration of gravity (g). For <br /> example, 1.0 g PGA in an earthquake (an extremely strong ground motion) means that <br /> objects accelerate sideways at the same rate as if they had been dropped from the <br /> ceiling. 10% g PGA means that the ground acceleration is 10% that of gravity and so <br /> on. <br /> <br /> Damage levels experienced in an earthquake vary with the intensity of ground shaking <br /> and with the seismic capacity of structures. Ground motions of only 1 or 2% g are <br /> widely felt by people; hanging plants and lamps swing strongly, but damage levels, if <br /> any, are usually very Iow. Ground motions below about 10% g usually cause only <br /> slight damage. Ground motions between about 10% g and 30% g may cause minor to <br /> moderate damage in well-designed buildings, with higher levels of damage in poorly <br /> designed buildings. At this level of ground shaking, only unusually poor buildings <br /> would be subject to potential collapse. Ground motions above about 30% g may cause <br /> significant damage in well-designed buildings and very high levels of damage <br /> (including collapse) in poorly designed buildings. Ground motions above about 50% g <br /> may cause high levels of damage in most buildings, even those designed to resist <br /> seismic forces. <br /> Public Review Draft: August 4, 2004 <br /> 10-2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.