My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4814
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:33 PM
Creation date
11/19/2004 10:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
11/8/2004
Document_Number
4814
CMO_Effective_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
extreme consequences of potential failure of one or more of these dams, we <br />recommend that detai~ed seismic evaluations be conducted for al~ of these dams. A~l <br />of these dams are owned and operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. <br />Therefore, pragmatically, the role of the Eugene/Springfield community wou~d be <br />pdmad~y to strongly encourage the Corps of Engineers to complete these urgently <br />required seismic evaluations as soon as possible. <br /> <br />2. A key step in mitigation planning for dam safety is emergency planning. Emergency <br />planners in the Eugene/Springfield Metro Area should obtain copies of the inundation <br />maps for each of the major dams to familiarize themselves with the areas of potentia~ <br />flooding. For emergency planning, the estimated flood depths and the time periods <br />from dam failure are particularly important. Flood depths and flood times both vary <br />markedly with distance downstream from the dam locations. For emergency p~anning, <br />key elements include community emergency notification procedures and evacuation <br />planning (routes and traffic control). Because of the 'very large numbers of potentia~ <br />evacuees, training seminars and scenario exercises are strongly recommended. <br /> <br />3. All of these dams have Emergency Action Plans. These plans should be reviewed <br />to ensure that they are complete and up to date. Emergency planning officials in each <br />county should be fully informed of the detailed consequences of the potential failure of <br />each dam. Public notification and evacuation plans should be updated and tested. <br />For some types of dam failures, for example, those due to extreme floods, there may <br />be some warning time. Decision making procedures, protocols~ and procedures for <br />issuing watches, warnings, and evacuation notices should be reviewed and updated <br />and coordinated among all responsible federal, state, and local agencies. <br /> <br />The table on the following page contains dam safety mitigation action items from the <br />master Action Items table in Chapter 4. <br /> <br />References <br /> <br />1. FEMA, Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classification Systems <br /> for Dams, FEMA 333, October 1998. <br /> <br />2. FEMA, Multihazard Identification and Risk Assessment, A Cornerstone of the <br /> National Mitigation Strategy, Chapter 20, Dam Failures, 1997. <br /> <br />3. FEMA, Dam Safety: An Owner's Guidance Manual, FEMA 145, August 1987. <br /> <br />4. National Research Council, Safety of Existing Dams, Evaluation and Improvement, <br /> National Academy Press, 1983. <br /> <br />5. FEMA website (www.fema.gov), National Dam Safety Program webpage. <br /> <br />6. Oregon Emergency Management Division, Dam/Levee Failure, Statewide Hazard <br /> Analysis, March, 1987. <br /> <br />7. Hills Creek Lake Project, Emergency Response Flowcha~, Distributed January <br /> 2000, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, 5 pages. <br />Public Review Draft: August 6, 2004 <br /> 12-10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.