My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4814
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:33 PM
Creation date
11/19/2004 10:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
11/8/2004
Document_Number
4814
CMO_Effective_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
events causing the flood loss claims, the repetitive loss list is not mathematically <br />rigorous. For example, some properties on the list may have simply been unlucky and <br />have experienced two flood events with Iow probabilities (e.g., 100-year or greater <br />events) within a short time period. Thus, the properties on the repetitive loss list may <br />be at relatively high flood risk or they may not. Correspondingly, there are almost <br />certainly other properties within the Eugene/Springfield Metro Area at equal or higher <br />levels of flood risk that are not on the FEMA repetitive loss list. These properties may <br />not have flood insurance or simply may have been lucky over the relatively short <br />reporting period for the NFIP repetitive loss list (data since 1978). <br /> <br />Despite these limitations of FEMA's repetitive loss list, properties within the <br />Eugene/Springfield Metro Area on the repetitive loss list may be good targets of <br />opportunity for flood mitigation. Most of FEMA's mitigation programs list repetitive <br />loss properties as high priorities for mitigation and thus obtaining FEMA funding for <br />properties on the repetitive loss list may be more likely than for properties not on the <br />list. <br /> <br />6,7 Estimating Flood Losses and Flood Risk <br /> <br />For most residential structures and many similar commercial and public structures, the <br />likely amount of building damage from floods of any given depth can be estimated <br />approximately using FEMA depth-damage tables. These depth damage tables are <br />derived from Federal Insurance Administration flood insurance claims data for several <br />million properties and thus represent typical damage levels for typical structures. <br />Although actual damages will vary somewhat from structure to structure, depending <br />also on flood conditions such as duration, velocity, and degree of contamination, these <br />typical values represent a good starting point to estimate flood damages for typical <br />structures and thus to help quantify the level of flood risk. Current FEMA depth- <br />damage data for typical structures are given in the Appendix - Example Mitigation <br />Projects. <br /> <br />When estimating flood losses or evaluating flood risk (for a structure or a whole <br />community) it is very important to recognize that the economic impact of floods <br />includes not only damages to buildings and contents but other economic impacts as <br />well, including: <br /> 1. damages to yards, vehicles, and outbuildings (not in depth damage <br /> data above), <br /> 2. displacement costs for temporary quarters while repairs are made, <br /> 3. loss of business income, <br /> 4. loss of public services. <br /> <br />In some cases, these economic impacts of floods can be a significant fraction of <br />building and contents damages, or even larger, especially for critical facilities or critical <br />infrastructure. FEMA's publication What is a Benefit? Draft Guidance for Benefit-Cost <br />Analysis provides an excellent primer, along with typical values and simple economic <br />methods, to place monetary values on the loss of function of buildings, critical <br />facilities, roads and bridges, and utility systems. <br /> <br />Public Review Draft: August 6, 2004 6-14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.