Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Other Jurisdictions <br />“”“ <br />Staff is unaware of any other jurisdiction in Oregon that has adopted a givings or value <br />” <br />added tax. The Metro Council (Metropolitan Service District) is looking at the possibility of <br />“”“” <br />adopting a windfall tax. The tax being discussed would be imposed on the windfall to <br />property owners when their land is brought inside the UGB. Half of the funds raised would be <br />used to purchase conservation easements on farmland that have valid Measure 37 claims. The <br />other half would be used to pay for public improvements like schools, roads and sewers in the <br /> <br />UGB expansion areas. Metrois continuing to examine this idea. <br /> <br />Tax Options <br />The proposed “givings tax” would be based upon the marginal additional real market value enjoyed by <br />the user of land as a result of certain governmental actions. As the beneficiary of the value of these <br />governmental actions, the user of the land, upon applying for change in zoning or plan designation <br />(Option 1) or a land use or building permit application utilizing designated legislative changes (Option <br />3) would be liable to pay the tax. <br /> <br />The City’s home rule powers give the council the authority to adopt such a tax and set a tax rate by <br />ordinance. No voter approval would be required, although the tax would be subject to referendum. <br />Current rezoning and plan amendment procedures or land use permit procedures will need to be revised <br />to incorporate the tax. <br /> <br />It is difficult to estimate the economic impacts that might result from implementation of a givings tax. If <br />the tax rate is low and the taxing process is not burdensome, it may have very little effect. But if the tax <br />rate is high or the process is burdensome, it could discourage citizen-initiated rezonings, changes in plan <br />designation, or building permit applications. To the extent these activities are discouraged, some <br />economic activity may be lost and some land may remain in a less efficient use that would otherwise be <br />the case. In the end, whether the tax has an economically detrimental effect will depend on the details of <br />its construction and implementation. <br /> <br />The City Attorney and staff from Finance and PDD have done further analysis of Option 1 – Tax on <br />“upzonings” and Option 3 – Tax on increase from legislative change. The two options are described <br />below and are summarized in the table in Attachment A. It is important to note that the Givings Tax <br />concept breaks new ground and there are many outstanding questions that remain to be answered as the <br />concept is developed. <br /> <br />Option 1 – Tax on Upzonings: <br />Citizens occasionally request the City to change the zoning on <br />property, or the land use designation for property in the Metro Plan or in a refinement plan. Oftentimes, <br />the change in zoning or plan designation will allow more valuable uses and will increase the real market <br />value of the property. Whether an increase will occur and its extent will vary considerably, depending <br />on location, types of uses allowed and the demand for a particular use. <br /> <br />While rezoning or change in designation in most cases will increase land real market value, the value of <br />existing improvements on the land may not increase. This is because existing improvements probably <br />will not see a change in use without some new investment, and may not be compatible at all with the <br />uses allowed under the new zone or plan designation. <br /> <br />Lane County Assessment and Taxation does not automatically revalue property that has been rezoned or <br />has had a change in plan designation. Instead, property is revalued under the new zone or change in <br /> L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060522\S060522C.doc <br /> <br />