CC Minutes - 04/10/06 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

From a practical sense, he said one of the reasons this had been considered early on was to allow the people who wished to advocate for the bond to organize to do some of the work it would take to pass the bond measure. Councilor Papé believed the City should do more than conduct land acquisition for parks in order to gain broad support for the bond measure. Councilor Bettman asked if Councilor Poling’s answers to her questions were his own answers or if they had come from staff. Councilor Poling responded that staff had advised him. He related that he made some phone calls to garner additional information to the information he already had. Councilor Bettman wanted some formal answers because taxpayers were paying for the field. She wondered who was going to have the highest priority for using those fields and how the financing was broken down. She also had some security issues. She said the other piece she needed “to get to yes” was a more specific list of soccer field projects. She expressed concern that without specifically tying the fields to school district property “one could turn up at Alton Baker Park.” She indicated she would support the installation of synthetic soccer fields to support the amendment. Councilor Pryor supported an increase in athletic fields, but he was leaning toward tabling the item for further discussion. He said the total amount of money in the bond should be kept small and the council should not keep adding to it for little projects. He indicated he would vote against the amendment at this point in the interest of tabling. He advocated for a conversation in terms of what would be the best balance of acquisition and recreation, open space, and parks projects. Councilor Kelly did not doubt there were needs for a wide variety of facilities, as indicated in the Public Forum testimony. He thought this conversation would be part of the project list. He was concerned that the council would stray from its original intention of focusing the bond measure on acquisition and would end up with a large omnibus measure that was too big to pass or it would end up with no measure at all. If the bond measure became too big, he would vote against placing it on the ballot. Councilor Taylor called the need for land acquisition urgent, as the land would not wait. She was willing to consider adding to the bond but would not consider reducing the amount dedicated for acquisition. She asked if there was anything to prevent the council from discussing additions to the bond at a later date. City Manager Taylor responded that he did not believe there would be anything wrong with the council indicating its desire to conclude with a list of a certain size. He said the decision would not address what would be placed on the ballot. He thought that all that was necessary to further the bond measure could be done and the motion could be tabled at the present meeting. Councilor Taylor asked if the council could add to a more specific list of projects later in the process. Mr. Lidz replied that it would not present a legal problem until the public information campaign had been begun. Councilor Taylor indicated she would oppose the amendment. Councilor Bettman agreed with Councilor Kelly. She offered a friendly amendment to include specific direction on the number of fields involved and that the synthetic fields would be constructed on school district property only. Councilor Poling accepted the friendly amendment. MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 10, 2006 Page 11 Regular Meeting