CC Minutes - 04/10/06 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

that was now underground in the Springfield portion of the park. He was concerned about one notion that would involve the conversion of the concrete weir to a “standing wave.” He pointed out that the weir was actually on the Springfield side of the freeway and under the jurisdiction of the Willamalane Recreation District. He did not know of any jurisdiction that would be willing to take on the potential liability of luring people into the middle of the river to surf into waves. He felt it was dangerous. Anna Houpt , 32496 Camas Swale Road, Creswell, said she visited a whitewater park in Kernville, California, that had been in existence for 30 years. She explained that kayakers and canoeists wear helmets and flotation devices. She stated that she was 51 and had been kayaking for 25 years. She hoped the council would support building a whitewater park as it provided a family activity in which people of all ages could participate. Scott Bridgham , 2221 Bristol Street, professor at the University of Oregon College of Environmental Science, spoke in favor of the restoration of the Alton Baker Park canal and the whitewater recreation facilities. He felt the restoration and whitewater projects a lot of “win-win” potential, such as addressing safety issues. He said he had jumped off the intake for the canal and he agreed that it was an extremely dangerous feature. He witnessed young children jumping off the intake facility. He was amazed that there had been no fatalities to date. He observed that the canal was in horrible shape and could be improved immensely, both in terms of habitat and the elimination of concrete structures that inhibit the ability of fish to swim upstream. He also enjoyed whitewater recreation. He said he had lived in South Bend, Indiana, and a whitewater park was located in the downtown area there. He thought such a park would put Eugene “on the map” and benefit it economically. Roxie Cuellar , 2053 Laura Street, Springfield, Home Builders Association (HBA), requested that the record be held open for seven days. She explained that the HBA was interested in one column on the project list and that was the growth allocation column. She said one type of project was neighborhood acquisition. The HBA opposed the requirement for new homes to pay 100 percent of the cost of acquiring the land for neighborhood parks. She attributed this to the use of a level-of-service approach. She had Lane Council of Governments (LCOG) prepare a map and she had drawn circles where the proposed neighborhood acquisitions would be. She determined that the sites were located in existing neighborhoods. She said if there was an existing deficiency, home builders should not have to pay 100 percent of the cost. Charles Biggs , 540 Antelope Way, asked the City Council to direct staff to get more public input on the revised PROS project list and plan because it had only been posted on the internet since April 6. He asserted that the general public had not had a chance to comprehend the design or the changes made since the City Council’s decision to adopt the plan. He advocated for an allocation of $1.8 million for riverfront land acquisition in the Willakenzie area to complete the 1970s Willamette Greenway Plan which sought to provide safe bicycle access to Armitage State Park and the future hospital. He observed that most of the land acquisition was directed at the establishment of neighborhood parks and did not provide interconnected habitat. He noted that one Priority 1 land acquisition was the Gillespie Butte access and natural area. He did not believe that this was needed as it was called out in the Willakenzie Area Refinement Plan. He also requested that Stryker Field Sports Complex in the Willakenzie area be removed from the list as he did not believe the project was supported by the data received during public comments on the draft PROS plan. He alleged that staff was able to redesignate a neighborhood park to a community park without due public process and registered his disapproval. He thought the Stryker Field facility would add to traffic difficulties in that area. He submitted his testimony in writing. MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 10, 2006 Page 16 Regular Meeting