My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2D - 2005 Leg.Policies Doc
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-12/06/04Mtg
>
Item 2D - 2005 Leg.Policies Doc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:34:32 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 2:42:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii. Financing State and Local Government <br /> <br />A. TAX POLICY <br /> <br /> The adoption and subsequent implementation of Ballot Measure 50 has substantially changed <br /> cities' approach to certain financial issues. With control of property taxes slipping further from <br /> local governments, it is imperative for cities to retain and expand both the revenue-raising <br /> authority and the revenue sources that they presently have. State tax policy has direct and <br /> indirect effects on the financial welfare of Oregon's cities. <br /> <br /> 1. RAINY-DAY FUND <br /> <br /> Oregon is one of only five states in the <br /> U.S. without an adequately funded <br /> General Precepts ;;rainy-day fund" to provide revenue <br /> stability in the event of economic <br /> downturn. The State's primary general- <br /> · The State should not take action that (1) reduces revenue, fund revenue source is the income tax, <br /> (2) increases costs to cities, or (3) preempts local authority which fluctuates with the economy. <br /> to raise revenue. If the State takes any of these actions, These income tax revenues were positive <br /> cities should be reimbursed for lost revenues or increased during the years of a strong economy in <br /> costs, most of Oregon, but as of late proven <br /> inadequate to support continuing levels <br /> · Decisions about local services should continue to be of state services while the economy is in <br /> made at the local level, a slow period. <br /> <br /> · Support actions to sustain the stability and adequacy of <br /> local revenue sources through positive and negative While stability of the state revenue <br /> economic cycles, system does not have a dollar-for-dollar <br /> impact on cities, in the current economic <br /> · Support actions to maintain or improve the stability of downturn it is possible that state <br /> State revenue sources, programs of importance to cities could <br /> faker. Cities as well as other local <br /> · The State should help cities to keep pace with the costs governments will likely suffer reductions <br /> of growth, particularly infrastructure needs associated in state shared revenue as well as <br /> with growth, increased demands for services due to <br /> reductions in state programs. <br /> · Support the use of System Development Charges (SDCs) <br /> to fund capital improvements for police, fire, schools and <br /> other local government services affected by new An adequate "rainy-day fund" has been <br /> development, identified as a critical way for the State to <br /> offset sudden reduction in revenues. It <br /> <br />City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.